Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add interactive flag to reference widgets #5313

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

juliusknorr
Copy link
Member

@juliusknorr juliusknorr commented Jan 26, 2024

Just for demo/testing purposes, this can be integrated in #5270

I'd like to get this merged to main for easier testing for now to be reverted once @max-nextcloud opens a pull request for #5270

@juliusknorr juliusknorr marked this pull request as draft January 26, 2024 07:34
@juliusknorr juliusknorr force-pushed the tmp/interactive-preview branch from bfc5058 to c9fbbc7 Compare February 19, 2024 12:16
@juliusknorr juliusknorr added enhancement New feature or request 3. to review labels Feb 19, 2024
@juliusknorr juliusknorr added this to the Nextcloud 29 milestone Feb 19, 2024
@juliusknorr juliusknorr marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2024 12:18
This reverts commit d14558b.

Signed-off-by: Julius Härtl <jus@bitgrid.net>
Signed-off-by: Julius Härtl <jus@bitgrid.net>
@juliusknorr juliusknorr force-pushed the tmp/interactive-preview branch from c9fbbc7 to db1ec2d Compare February 19, 2024 12:18
Copy link
Member

@mejo- mejo- left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hehe, welcome back ParagraphView 🤗

@juliusknorr juliusknorr merged commit 060e8e5 into main Feb 19, 2024
58 checks passed
@juliusknorr juliusknorr deleted the tmp/interactive-preview branch February 19, 2024 20:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3. to review enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants