-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improved energy calculation for high l states (l>5) and quantum defect updates for Cs and K. #173
Open
johnny-sa
wants to merge
4
commits into
nikolasibalic:draft_v3.6.0
Choose a base branch
from
johnny-sa:Energy-Additions
base: draft_v3.6.0
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8fef945
Added Polarisation Energy for high l states
johnny-sa f55756e
Updated qds for K and Cs and Core polarisabilities
johnny-sa e4a2e49
Added polarisation energy for high l (l>5) states
johnny-sa d54d900
Formatting and References for high L energies
johnny-sa File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe above is correct based on your numerical results, however, is there some reference where these equations have been originally derived, that we can reference in commend directly in code?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the original is from J. E. Mayer and M. G. Mayer, Phys. Bev. 43, 605
(1933).
The Freeman and Kleppner Physical Review A 14.5 (1976): 1614 I reference cites this work.
On overview is also given in pgs 340-364 `Spectroscopy_of_alkali_Rydberg_states' in Gallagher's Rydberg atoms (which they themselves cite Mayer and Mayer as the origin)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you are referring to the expectation values see https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.42.1123 or more appropriately https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.9.1087