Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix linear #613

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Fix linear #613

merged 8 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

dan-garvey
Copy link
Member

Fixes punet regression from linear.py
I went a little crazy with the fake-quant arg and the logic was
ugly. Now the fake_quant arg only affects q_input. The purpose in having
it at all is to allow exporting and fake eager using the same irpa file

dan-garvey and others added 2 commits November 26, 2024 09:23
I went a little crazy with the fake-quant arg and the logic was
ugly. Now the fake_quant arg only affects q_input. The purpose in having
it at all is to allow exporting and fake eager using the same irpa file
@nithinsubbiah
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like sharktank integration test is still failing

Copy link
Contributor

@nithinsubbiah nithinsubbiah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing the export. I don't know if the llama data dependent test failure is expected, contingent on that good to merge.

@nithinsubbiah nithinsubbiah enabled auto-merge (squash) November 27, 2024 00:27
@nithinsubbiah nithinsubbiah merged commit 9e1e121 into main Nov 27, 2024
5 of 8 checks passed
@nithinsubbiah nithinsubbiah deleted the fix_linear branch November 27, 2024 00:29
@dan-garvey
Copy link
Member Author

I'm not sure this is okay to merge as is, it takes over an hour to run the punet

ScottTodd added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2024
Partial revert of #613.

This job takes over an hour to run (specifically
`test_punet_eager_fp16_validation `) and is not suitable for presubmit.

This is likely also not the right file for such tests, and if it was
then the specialized tests should go under the generic `test` job, not
at the top of the file.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants