wip: nrf9131ek board files #12080
wip: nrf9131ek board files #12080
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
the
changelog-entry-required
| # Copyright (c) 2023 Nordic Semiconductor ASA | ||
| # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
|
|
||
| if SOC_NRF9161_SICA |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should there be a new SOC also?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good question! technically, it shouldn't be necessary, but it could be for documentation reasons. we could also nename nRF9161 to nRF91X1. Who would decide this?
boards/arm/nrf9131ek_nrf9131/nrf9131ek_nrf9131_partition_conf.dtsi
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Soc definition is quite lightweight https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/2fe449356488808ac98b56908eddba36c16b7e95/soc/arm/nordic_nrf/nrf91/Kconfig.soc#L29 |
|
You can find the documentation preview for this PR at this link. It will be updated about 10 minutes after the documentation build succeeds. Note: This comment is automatically posted by the Documentation Publishing GitHub Action. |
maxd-nordic
force-pushed
the
nrf9131-eb
branch
from
675ab4d
to
4389286
Compare
|
Created a zephyr PR for the new SOC. Let's see how that goes: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#61724 |
|
This pull request has been marked as stale because it has been open (more than) 60 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment saying that you would like to have the label removed otherwise this pull request will automatically be closed in 14 days. Note, that you can always re-open a closed pull request at any time. |
No description provided.