comment skipped tests

okta · Jun 14, 2024 · 268edc4 · 268edc4
1 parent 8ed48b2
commit 268edc4
Showing 1 changed file with 46 additions and 46 deletions.
diff --git a/test/testcafe/spec/DeviceChallengePollView_spec.js b/test/testcafe/spec/DeviceChallengePollView_spec.js
@@ -317,38 +317,38 @@ async function setupLoopbackFallback(t, widgetOptions) {
 }
 
 // TODO: fix quarantined test - OKTA-645716
-test.skip
- .requestHooks(loopbackSuccessLogger, loopbackSuccessMock)('in loopback server approach, probing and polling requests are sent and responded', async t => {
- const deviceChallengePollPageObject = await setup(t);
- await checkA11y(t);
- await t.expect(deviceChallengePollPageObject.getBeaconSelector()).contains(BEACON_CLASS);
- await t.expect(deviceChallengePollPageObject.getFormTitle()).eql('Verifying your identity');
- await t.expect(deviceChallengePollPageObject.getFooterCancelPollingLink().exists).eql(true);
- await t.expect(loopbackSuccessLogger.count(
- record => record.response.statusCode === 200 &&
- record.request.url.match(/introspect/)
- )).eql(1);
- await t.expect(loopbackSuccessLogger.count(
- record => record.response.statusCode === 500 &&
- record.request.url.match(/2000/)
- )).eql(1);
- await t.expect(loopbackSuccessLogger.count(
- record => record.response.statusCode === 200 &&
- record.request.method === 'get' &&
- record.request.url.match(/6511\/probe/)
- )).eql(1);
- await t.expect(loopbackSuccessLogger.count(
- record => record.response.statusCode === 200 &&
- record.request.url.match(/6511\/challenge/) &&
- record.request.body.match(/challengeRequest":"eyJraWQiOiI1/)
- )).eql(1);
- failureCount = 2;
- await t.expect(loopbackSuccessLogger.contains(record => record.request.url.match(/6512|6513/))).eql(false);
-
- const identityPage = new IdentityPageObject(t);
- await identityPage.fillIdentifierField('Test Identifier');
- await t.expect(identityPage.getIdentifierValue()).eql('Test Identifier');
- });
+// test.skip
+//  .requestHooks(loopbackSuccessLogger, loopbackSuccessMock)('in loopback server approach, probing and polling requests are sent and responded', async t => {
+//  const deviceChallengePollPageObject = await setup(t);
+//  await checkA11y(t);
+//  await t.expect(deviceChallengePollPageObject.getBeaconSelector()).contains(BEACON_CLASS);
+//  await t.expect(deviceChallengePollPageObject.getFormTitle()).eql('Verifying your identity');
+//  await t.expect(deviceChallengePollPageObject.getFooterCancelPollingLink().exists).eql(true);
+//  await t.expect(loopbackSuccessLogger.count(
+//  record => record.response.statusCode === 200 &&
+//  record.request.url.match(/introspect/)
+//  )).eql(1);
+//  await t.expect(loopbackSuccessLogger.count(
+//  record => record.response.statusCode === 500 &&
+//  record.request.url.match(/2000/)
+//  )).eql(1);
+//  await t.expect(loopbackSuccessLogger.count(
+//  record => record.response.statusCode === 200 &&
+//  record.request.method === 'get' &&
+//  record.request.url.match(/6511\/probe/)
+//  )).eql(1);
+//  await t.expect(loopbackSuccessLogger.count(
+//  record => record.response.statusCode === 200 &&
+//  record.request.url.match(/6511\/challenge/) &&
+//  record.request.body.match(/challengeRequest":"eyJraWQiOiI1/)
+//  )).eql(1);
+//  failureCount = 2;
+//  await t.expect(loopbackSuccessLogger.contains(record => record.request.url.match(/6512|6513/))).eql(false);
+
+//  const identityPage = new IdentityPageObject(t);
+//  await identityPage.fillIdentifierField('Test Identifier');
+//  await t.expect(identityPage.getIdentifierValue()).eql('Test Identifier');
+//  });
 
 test
  .requestHooks(loopbackUserCancelLogger, loopbackUserCancelLoggerMock)('request body has reason value of true when user clicks cancel and go back link', async t => {
@@ -376,20 +376,20 @@ test
  })).eql(1);
  });
 
-test
- .requestHooks(loopbackPollTimeoutLogger, loopbackPollTimeoutMock).skip('new poll does not starts until last one is ended', async t => {
- await setup(t);
- await checkA11y(t);
- // This test verify if new /poll calls are made only if the previous one was finished instead of polling with fixed interval.
- // Updating /poll response to take 5 sec to response.
- // Then counting the number of calls that should be done in time interval. Default Timeout for /poll is 2 sec.
- // Expecting to get only 2 calls(first at 2nd sec, second at 9th(5 sec response + 2 sec timeout) second).
- await t.wait(10_000);
-
- await t.expect(loopbackPollTimeoutLogger.count(
- record => record.request.url.match(/\/idp\/idx\/authenticators\/poll/)
- )).eql(2);
- });
+// test.skip
+// .requestHooks(loopbackPollTimeoutLogger, loopbackPollTimeoutMock)('new poll does not starts until last one is ended', async t => {
+//  await setup(t);
+//  await checkA11y(t);
+//  // This test verify if new /poll calls are made only if the previous one was finished instead of polling with fixed interval.
+//  // Updating /poll response to take 5 sec to response.
+//  // Then counting the number of calls that should be done in time interval. Default Timeout for /poll is 2 sec.
+//  // Expecting to get only 2 calls(first at 2nd sec, second at 9th(5 sec response + 2 sec timeout) second).
+//  await t.wait(10_000);
+
+//  await t.expect(loopbackPollTimeoutLogger.count(
+//  record => record.request.url.match(/\/idp\/idx\/authenticators\/poll/)
+//  )).eql(2);
+//  });
 
 test
  .requestHooks(loopbackChallengeErrorLogger, loopbackChallengeErrorMock)('in loopback server approach, will cancel polling when challenge errors out', async t => {