[oneDPL][ranges] An implementation fix for a random access range without operator[] and size() method #1969
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[oneDPL][ranges] + implementation fix for a random access range without operator[] and size() method.
Update: Discussed offline with @rarutyun.
The approach has a significant downside - range type is being changed, causing by a type-wrapper in the code.
The original issue should be discussed additionally with team and the architect in particular.
(As an option - to introduce
oneapi::dpl::subscript_operator_fn
global functor object with correspondingoperator()
overloads and use the function instead ofoperator[]
everywhere on oneDPL for ranges.)