Convenient rspec matchers for testing your graphql-ruby API/Schema.
gem 'rspec-graphql_matchers'
The matchers currently supported are:
expect(a_graphql_object).to have_a_field(field_name).of_type(valid_type)
expect(a_graphql_object).to implement(interface_name, ...)
expect(a_mutation_type).to have_a_return_field(field_name).returning(valid_type)
expect(a_mutation_type).to have_an_input_field(field_name).of_type(valid_type)
expect(a_field).to be_of_type(valid_type)
expect(an_input).to accept_argument(argument_name).of_type(valid_type)
Where a valid type for the expectation is either:
- A reference to the actual type you expect;
- [Recommended] A String representation of a type:
"String!"
,"Int!"
,"[String]!"
(note the exclamation mark at the end, as required by the GraphQL specs.
For objects defined with the legacy #define
api, testing :property
, :hash_key
and metadata is also possible by chaining .with_property
, .with_hash_key
and .with_metadata
. For example:
expect(a_graphql_object).to have_a_field(field_name).with_property(property_name).with_metadata(metadata_hash)
expect(a_graphql_object).to have_a_field(field_name).with_hash_key(hash_key)
Given a GraphQL object defined as
class PostType < GraphQL::Schema::Object
graphql_name "Post"
description "A blog post"
implements GraphQL::Relay::Node.interface
field :id, ID, null: false
field :comments, [String], null: false
field :isPublished, Boolean, null: true
field :subposts, PostType, null: true do
argument :filter, types.String, required: false
argument :id, types.ID, required: false
end
end
describe PostType do
subject { described_class }
it { is_expected.to have_field(:id).of_type(!types.ID) }
it { is_expected.to have_field(:comments).of_type("[String!]!") }
it { is_expected.to have_field(:isPublished).of_type("Boolean") }
end
describe PostType do
describe 'id' do
subject { PostType.fields['id'] }
it { is_expected.to be_of_type('ID!') }
it { is_expected.not_to be_of_type('Float!') }
end
describe 'subposts' do
subject { PostType.fields['subposts'] }
it { is_expected.to be_of_type('Post') }
end
end
3) For objects defined using the legacy #define
api, you can also use with_property
, with_hash_key
and with_metadata
:
PostTypeWithDefineApi = GraphQL::ObjectType.define do
name "DefinedPost"
interfaces [GraphQL::Relay::Node.interface]
field :id, !types.ID, property: :post_id
field :comments, !types[types.String], hash_key: :post_comments
field :isPublished, admin_only: true
end
describe PostTypeWithDefineApi do
it { is_expected.to have_a_field(:id).of_type('ID!').with_property(:post_id) }
it { is_expected.to have_a_field(:comments).with_hash_key(:post_comments) }
it { is_expected.to have_a_field(:isPublished).with_metadata(admin_only: true) }
end
describe PostType do
describe 'subposts' do
subject { PostType.fields['subposts'] }
it 'accepts a filter and an id argument, of types String and ID' do
expect(subject).to accept_argument(:filter).of_type('String')
expect(subject).to accept_argument(:id).of_type('ID')
end
it { is_expected.not_to accept_argument(:weirdo) }
end
end
describe PostType do
subject { described_class }
it 'implements interface Node' do
expect(subject).to implement('Node')
end
# Accepts arguments as an array and type objects directly
it { is_expected.to implement(GraphQL::Relay::Node.interface) }
it { is_expected.not_to implement('OtherInterface') }
end
- Support GraphQL 1.9.x;
- Check the method used for resolving a field;
- New matchers!
- Send Bug reports, suggestions or any general question through the Issue tracker. Think of another matcher that could be useful? This is the place to ask, or...
- Pull requests are welcome through the usual procedure: fork the project, commit your changes and open the PR.
This project is intended to be a safe, welcoming space for collaboration, and contributors are expected to adhere to the Contributor Covenant code of conduct.
The gem is available as open source under the terms of the MIT License.