Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix writeTimeoutPacket vuln #83

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

fix writeTimeoutPacket vuln #83

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

RnkSngh
Copy link
Collaborator

@RnkSngh RnkSngh commented Apr 11, 2024

Quick PR to fix the vuln in writetimeoutpacket to check for proofs before writing a timeout. Since we're checking for a proof of the packet existing in the ibc state, an arbitrary packet with only the timeout changed cannot be spoofed now.

Note that this doesn't patch the vuln for channels which use the dummy light client, though this seems to be expected that these channels in general are not secure

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced security for packet processing in the Dispatcher contract by requiring an additional verification proof (Ics23Proof).
  • Tests

    • Added a new test to validate the prevention of packet spoofing in timeout scenarios.
  • Refactor

    • Updated the writeTimeoutPacket function across contracts and interfaces to include proof verification.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing security and functionality in the Dispatcher.sol contract by requiring an Ics23Proof for the writeTimeoutPacket function. This additional verification step ensures the integrity of packet timeouts. Changes are also mirrored in interface updates and test enhancements to support these modifications.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
contracts/core/Dispatcher.sol,
contracts/interfaces/IDispatcher.sol
Added Ics23Proof parameter to writeTimeoutPacket for enhanced verification.
test/Dispatcher.t.sol Updated src address and added test_writeTimeoutPacket_cannot_Spoof_Packet to prevent spoofing.
test/upgradeableProxy/upgrades/DispatcherV2.sol Updated writeTimeoutPacket function to include Ics23Proof parameter and verification logic.

Possibly related issues

🐇💬
Oh, hoppity hop, in the code we weave,
A proof so strong, deceivers can't deceive.
Packets time out, but with grace they leave,
With proofs in place, we all believe.
🌟📜✨


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a8010a and 787cbe3.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • contracts/core/Dispatcher.sol (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • contracts/core/Dispatcher.sol

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Collaborator

@dshiell dshiell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks correct to me!

@RnkSngh RnkSngh force-pushed the raunak/writeTimeoutPacketFix branch from fdc19c9 to 5a8010a Compare April 11, 2024 20:11
@RnkSngh RnkSngh merged commit 06a042f into main Apr 12, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants