-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat!: Use Rack Events By Default #709
Merged
arielvalentin
merged 5 commits into
open-telemetry:main
from
arielvalentin:use-rack-events-by-default
Dec 23, 2023
Merged
feat!: Use Rack Events By Default #709
arielvalentin
merged 5 commits into
open-telemetry:main
from
arielvalentin:use-rack-events-by-default
Dec 23, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
arielvalentin
requested review from
fbogsany,
mwear,
robertlaurin,
dazuma,
ericmustin,
ahayworth,
plantfansam,
robbkidd,
simi and
kaylareopelle
as code owners
October 28, 2023 19:30
...ation/rails/test/instrumentation/opentelemetry/instrumentation/rails/instrumentation_test.rb
Show resolved
Hide resolved
instrumentation/rack/lib/opentelemetry/instrumentation/rack/instrumentation.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
kaylareopelle
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2023
👋 This pull request has been marked as stale because it has been open with no activity. You can: comment on the issue or remove the stale label to hold stale off for a while, add the |
arielvalentin
added
keep
Ensures stale-bot keeps this issue/PR open
and removed
stale
Marks an issue/PR stale
labels
Dec 23, 2023
I have been running the `Rack::Events` based instrumentation in our production workloads since 2023-10-23. There is no noticeable difference in performance, however applications using `Rack::BodyProxy` to stream responses will notice a slight increase in latency since it will include timings writing response output to the socket.
Co-authored-by: Kayla Reopelle (she/her) <87386821+kaylareopelle@users.noreply.github.com>
arielvalentin
force-pushed
the
use-rack-events-by-default
branch
from
December 23, 2023 15:59
4551592
to
aee2d7c
Compare
arielvalentin
changed the title
feat(rack)! Use Rack Events By Default
feat!: Use Rack Events By Default
Jan 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have been running the
Rack::Events
based instrumentation in our production workloads since 2023-10-23.There is no noticeable difference in performance, however applications using
Rack::BodyProxy
to stream responses will notice a slight increase in latency since it will include timings writing response output to the socket.