Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrected operator== for the family of cryptoparameters classes #914

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

dsuponitskiy
Copy link
Collaborator

@dsuponitskiy dsuponitskiy commented Nov 25, 2024

  • Corrected operator== for the family of cryptoparameters classes
  • Fixed syntax for multiple virtual functions and virtual destructors
  • Made some print functions protected to force users to use operator<<()
  • Fixed multiple various issues, etc.

@dsuponitskiy dsuponitskiy added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 25, 2024
@dsuponitskiy dsuponitskiy added this to the Release 1.3.0 milestone Nov 25, 2024
@dsuponitskiy dsuponitskiy self-assigned this Nov 25, 2024
@dsuponitskiy dsuponitskiy linked an issue Nov 25, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
…e some print functions protected to force users to use operator<<(), fixed multiple issues, etc.
@pascoec pascoec merged commit b81c85c into tmp-dev Nov 29, 2024
73 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix a bug in CryptoParametersRNS' "operator==()" Fix the logic in PrintValue()
3 participants