-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
698 improve test coverage in design methodsr #704
Merged
Puzzled-Face
merged 15 commits into
main
from
698-improve-test-coverage-in-design-methodsr
Nov 20, 2023
Merged
698 improve test coverage in design methodsr #704
Puzzled-Face
merged 15 commits into
main
from
698-improve-test-coverage-in-design-methodsr
Nov 20, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Code Coverage Summary
Diff against main
Results for commit: 54a3b1f Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Merge branch '698-improve-test-coverage-in-design-methodsr' of github.com:Roche/crmPack into 698-improve-test-coverage-in-design-methodsr # Conflicts: # tests/testthat/test-Design-methods.R
Merge branch '698-improve-test-coverage-in-design-methodsr' of github.com:Roche/crmPack into 698-improve-test-coverage-in-design-methodsr # Conflicts: # tests/testthat/test-Design-methods.R
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @Puzzled-Face for the initiative, much appreciated - please see comments below
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into 698-improve-test-coverage-in-design-methodsr # Conflicts: # tests/testthat/_snaps/Design-methods.md # tests/testthat/test-Design-methods.R
Unit Test Performance Difference
Additional test case details
Results for commit ddf0b83 ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
danielinteractive
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2023
Puzzled-Face
deleted the
698-improve-test-coverage-in-design-methodsr
branch
November 20, 2023 15:48
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR increases test coverage from 15% to 72%.
Generally speaking, code dealing with placebo and sentinel patients is not currently covered.
simulate-DualDesign
appears to produce inconsistent resultssimulate-DADesign
appears to produce inconsistent resultssimulate-DualResponsesSamplesDesign
is almost 1000 lines longNext steps are to move design generation code into helper functions and generalise to allow for the inclusion of placebo patients.