Correct index mapping types

[Xtansia]

Description

Correct index mapping types

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[github-actions]

Changes Analysis

Commit SHA: 7aa99de
Comparing To SHA: 0871d02

API Changes

Summary

├─┬Paths
│ ├─┬/_index_template/{name}
│ │ ├─┬PUT
│ │ │ └─┬Requestbody
│ │ │   └─┬application/json
│ │ │     └─┬Schema
│ │ │       └─┬priority
│ │ │         └──[🔀] type (26135:23)❌ 
│ │ └─┬POST
│ │   └─┬Requestbody
│ │     └─┬application/json
│ │       └─┬Schema
│ │         └─┬priority
│ │           └──[🔀] type (26135:23)❌ 
│ └─┬/_index_template/_simulate_index/{name}
│   └─┬POST
│     └─┬Requestbody
│       └─┬application/json
│         └─┬Schema
│           └─┬priority
│             └──[🔀] type (26315:23)❌ 
└─┬Components
  ├──[➖] schemas (49173:7)❌ 
  ├──[➖] schemas (39604:7)❌ 
  ├──[➖] schemas (39037:7)❌ 
  ├──[➖] schemas (39050:7)❌ 
  ├──[➖] schemas (39817:7)❌ 
  ├──[➖] schemas (39175:7)❌ 
  ├──[➖] schemas (39904:7)❌ 
  ├──[➕] schemas (39256:7)
  ├─┬_common.mapping___Property
  │ ├──[➖] oneOf (39989:7)❌ 
  │ ├──[➖] oneOf (39126:7)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39941:24)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39653:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39547:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39666:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39257:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39155:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (38971:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (38883:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (38995:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39384:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39516:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39959:24)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39452:9)❌ 
  │ ├─┬ONEOF
  │ │ └──[🔀] $ref (39918:9)❌ 
  │ └─┬ONEOF
  │   └──[🔀] $ref (39092:9)❌ 
  ├─┬indices._common___IndexTemplate
  │ └─┬priority
  │   ├──[🔀] type (49116:17)❌ 
  │   └──[➕] format (49117:19)❌ 
  ├─┬_core.field_caps___FieldCapability
  │ ├──[➖] properties (42384:9)❌ 
  │ ├──[➖] properties (42377:9)❌ 
  │ ├──[➖] properties (42372:9)❌ 
  │ └──[➖] properties (42375:9)❌ 
  ├─┬_common.mapping___IpProperty
  │ └─┬ALLOF
  │   ├──[➖] properties (39372:13)❌ 
  │   ├──[➖] properties (39374:13)❌ 
  │   └──[➖] properties (39376:13)❌ 
  ├─┬indices._common___IndexSettings
  │ └──[➖] properties (48834:9)❌ 
  ├─┬_common.mapping___KeywordProperty
  │ └─┬ALLOF
  │   └──[➖] properties (39439:13)❌ 
  ├─┬_common.mapping___NumberPropertyBase
  │ └─┬ALLOF
  │   ├──[➖] properties (39583:13)❌ 
  │   ├──[➖] properties (39585:13)❌ 
  │   ├──[➖] properties (39589:13)❌ 
  │   └──[➖] properties (39587:13)❌ 
  └─┬_common.mapping___AggregateMetricDoubleProperty
    └─┬ALLOF
      └──[➖] properties (38832:13)❌ 

Document Element	Total Changes	Breaking Changes
paths	3	3
components	41	49

• ❌ BREAKING Changes: 52 out of 44
• Modifications: 19
• Removals: 23
• Additions: 2
• Breaking Removals: 23
• Breaking Modifications: 19
• Breaking Additions: 1

Report

The full API changes report is available at: https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-api-specification/actions/runs/11825892694/artifacts/2184419706

API Coverage

	Before	After	Δ
Covered (%)	588 (57.59 %)	588 (57.59 %)	0 (0 %)
Uncovered (%)	433 (42.41 %)	433 (42.41 %)	0 (0 %)
Unknown	40	40	0

[github-actions]

Spec Test Coverage Analysis

Total	Tested
515	347 (67.38 %)

[dblock]

Fix linter.

Add a test, at least one that exercises the added IcuCollationKeywordProperty?

[dblock]

Rebase?

Also in #609 @rursprung is adding an analysis plugin test like this one. Should we combine them into one analysis folder or not?