-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(loading): [loading] Fixed an issue with the loading document level. #2707
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves removing two CSS z-index variables from the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
examples/sites/src/views/components/components.vue (1)
Line range hint
800-1000
: Document z-index layers for better maintainability.Consider adding a comment block documenting the z-index hierarchy of different layers in the documentation UI. This will help maintain a clear understanding of the stacking context.
Add a comment block like this at the top of the style section:
<style lang="less" scoped> + /* + * Z-index hierarchy: + * - markdown-top-body: var(--docs-markdown-top-body-zindex) + * - tabs header: var(--docs-tabs-header-zindex) + */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
examples/sites/src/style.css
(0 hunks)examples/sites/src/views/components/components.vue
(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- examples/sites/src/style.css
🔇 Additional comments (1)
examples/sites/src/views/components/components.vue (1)
3-3
: LGTM! Class binding simplification improves clarity.
The removal of highlight-related class bindings helps streamline the documentation hierarchy.
Let's verify that no z-index conflicts exist in the current hierarchy:
Also applies to: 100-100
✅ Verification successful
No z-index conflicts found in documentation hierarchy
Based on the search results, there are no z-index conflicts in the documentation hierarchy. The removed class bindings (docs-header-highlight
and docs-content-tabs-highlight
) were related to styling and not z-index management. The documentation components in examples/sites/src/views/components/components.vue
use CSS variables for z-index values, ensuring proper layering:
- Header:
--docs-markdown-top-body-zindex
- Tabs:
--docs-tabs-header-zindex
These variables provide a centralized way to manage z-index values and prevent conflicts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential z-index conflicts in the documentation hierarchy
# Test: Search for z-index declarations in style files
rg -g '*.{vue,css,less,scss}' 'z-index|zIndex' --no-heading
Length of output: 24330
@chenxi-20 可否贴一个修复前后的效果对比图? |
@chenxi-20 Can you post a comparison picture of the effect before and after the repair? |
@kagol 已贴 |
Posted |
docs(loading): 修复loading文档层级的问题
前:
后:
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: #2675
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Style