-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed unpatched object storage url bug in unit test #340
Conversation
Please add a Jira ticket if there is one. |
📌 Cov diff with main: No success to gather report. 😿 📌 Overall coverage: No success to gather report. 😿 |
|
📌 Cov diff with main: No success to gather report. 😿 📌 Overall coverage: No success to gather report. 😿 |
1 similar comment
📌 Cov diff with main: No success to gather report. 😿 📌 Overall coverage: No success to gather report. 😿 |
|
"""prepare a model by only providing inference conda env.""" | ||
inference_conda_env="oci://service-conda-packs@ociodscdev/service_pack/cpu/General_Machine_Learning_for_CPUs/1.0/mlcpuv1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can it be used more dummy values, something like this:
oci://bucket@namespace/prefix
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ dependencies = [ | |||
"asteval>=0.9.25", | |||
"cerberus>=1.3.4", | |||
"cloudpickle>=1.6.0", | |||
"fsspec>=0.8.7", | |||
"fsspec>=0.8.7,<2023.9.1", # v2.9.1 introduced issues, releved by unit tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
revealed instead of releved. Not critical, I can update type with my PR in future
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ onnx = [ | |||
"lightgbm==3.3.1", | |||
"onnx>=1.12.0", | |||
"onnxmltools>=1.10.0", | |||
"onnxruntime>=1.10.0", | |||
"onnxruntime>=1.10.0,<1.16", # v1.16 introduced issues https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/issues/17631, releved by unit tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
revealed instead of releved. Not critical, I can update type with my PR in future
Fixed unpatched object storage url bug in unit test.