Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf(semantic): avoid repeated hashing resolving bindings #4238

Conversation

overlookmotel
Copy link
Collaborator

@overlookmotel overlookmotel commented Jul 12, 2024

WIP. Just an experiment really at this stage.

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Jul 12, 2024

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into main

Add the label “merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-semantic Area - Semantic label Jul 12, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator Author

overlookmotel commented Jul 12, 2024

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @overlookmotel and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 12, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #4238 will not alter performance

Comparing 07-12-perf_semantic_avoid_repeated_hashing_resolving_bindings (480090c) with main (ab41c52)

Summary

✅ 32 untouched benchmarks

@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 07-12-perf_semantic_avoid_repeated_hashing_resolving_bindings branch from 681b7f6 to 0620d75 Compare July 12, 2024 19:01
@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-linter Area - Linter label Jul 12, 2024
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 07-12-perf_semantic_avoid_repeated_hashing_resolving_bindings branch from 67268c4 to b1b4b96 Compare July 13, 2024 02:09
@overlookmotel overlookmotel changed the base branch from main to 07-13-fix_semantic_do_not_resolve_references_after_formalparameters_in_ts_type July 13, 2024 02:09
@overlookmotel overlookmotel requested review from Dunqing and removed request for Dunqing July 13, 2024 02:10
@Boshen Boshen force-pushed the 07-13-fix_semantic_do_not_resolve_references_after_formalparameters_in_ts_type branch from 531bf11 to 22d56bd Compare July 13, 2024 02:43
@Boshen Boshen changed the base branch from 07-13-fix_semantic_do_not_resolve_references_after_formalparameters_in_ts_type to main July 13, 2024 02:47
@Boshen Boshen force-pushed the 07-12-perf_semantic_avoid_repeated_hashing_resolving_bindings branch from b1b4b96 to 9775674 Compare July 13, 2024 02:47
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 07-12-perf_semantic_avoid_repeated_hashing_resolving_bindings branch from 9775674 to 463b7d1 Compare July 13, 2024 20:52
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 07-12-perf_semantic_avoid_repeated_hashing_resolving_bindings branch from 44c6662 to 406d97e Compare July 13, 2024 21:31
@overlookmotel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

overlookmotel commented Jul 13, 2024

@Boshen This is my attempt at oxc-project/backlog#83. It stores hashes and so avoids rehashing on every insert, but the benchmark result is meh. Disappointing!

I've tried tweaking it in a bunch of ways, but nothing seems to make much difference.

Do you think worth tidying it up and merging? Or leave it for now and see if storing hash in Atom and using that everywhere has more of an effect?

@Boshen
Copy link
Member

Boshen commented Jul 14, 2024

Let's close. This'll make future changes harder.

@Boshen Boshen closed this Jul 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-linter Area - Linter A-semantic Area - Semantic
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants