Release 2.1

[osalyk]

This change is 

[grom72]

Reviewed 4 of 4 files at r1.
Reviewable status: 1 of 4 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @janekmi and @osalyk)

---

ChangeLog line 18 at r1 (raw file):

	- Introduces fuses against ill-considered use of NDCTL_ENABLE=n.
	  - PMEMOBJ_IGNORE_DIRTY_SHUTDOWN and PMEMOBJ_IGNORE_BAD_BLOCKS are required to acknowledge the understanding of what production-critical functions are missing for the build without NDCTL.
	- Does not allow opening PMEMOBJ pool without unsafe shutdown counter (USC) if not explicitly disabled. (#5968)

Suggestion:

Does not allow create PMEMOBJ pool without unsafe shutdown counter (USC) if not explicitly disabled. (#5968)

[janekmi]

Reviewed 4 of 4 files at r1, 2 of 2 files at r2, 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @osalyk)

---

-- commits line 8 at r3:
What is it?

Code quote:

New commits in r3 on 5/23/2024 at 2:08 PM:
- 293e0f2: Merge branch 'stable-2.1' into release-2.1

[grom72]

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r2, 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @osalyk)

[osalyk]

Reviewable status: 0 of 4 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @grom72 and @janekmi)

---

-- commits line 8 at r3:

Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…

What is it?

Master differs from stable. I had to merge the changes

---

ChangeLog line 18 at r1 (raw file):

	- Introduces fuses against ill-considered use of NDCTL_ENABLE=n.
	  - PMEMOBJ_IGNORE_DIRTY_SHUTDOWN and PMEMOBJ_IGNORE_BAD_BLOCKS are required to acknowledge the understanding of what production-critical functions are missing for the build without NDCTL.
	- Does not allow opening PMEMOBJ pool without unsafe shutdown counter (USC) if not explicitly disabled. (#5968)

Done.

[grom72]

Reviewed 4 of 4 files at r4, 3 of 3 files at r5, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @janekmi)

[janekmi]

Reviewed 1 of 4 files at r4, 3 of 3 files at r5, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @osalyk)