[Network modification] Modify log when no extension is created. #3100
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…with its bay. Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <coline.piloquet@rte-france.com>
EtienneLt
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2024
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <coline.piloquet@rte-france.com>
olperr1
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2024
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
No
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Log update
What is the current behavior?
The log message is pretty unclear without context, especially in the reporter:
"No extensions found on voltageLevel
voltageLevel. The extension on the connectable is not created."What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
I tried to make the log a bit clearer by specifying the extension name:
ConnectablePositionand the name of the feeder.Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?