Skip to content

Issues: propensive/cardinality

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3 Open 1 Closed
3 Open 1 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Use type members to represent upper and lower bounds api Relates to the API design code quality Concerns the standard of code rather than functionality severe Has a significant impact on many users
#6 opened Dec 2, 2024 by propensive
@propensive
Reimplement operators using Symbolism api Relates to the API design code quality Concerns the standard of code rather than functionality core Describes core required functionality
#4 opened Jul 24, 2023 by propensive
@propensive
Investigate whether Int ranges can be supported like Double ranges api Relates to the API design enhancement An improvement to existing functionality minor Has only a small impact for the majority of users question Looking for an answer
#3 opened Jan 2, 2023 by propensive
@propensive
2
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.