-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PUSCH receiver kernels #108
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
3fae5dd
to
d7c809d
Compare
d7c809d
to
b9ff155
Compare
21bbf18
to
4ba934c
Compare
26dacc3
to
bf0e68d
Compare
d1605f1
to
a1bc514
Compare
c7c4ea6
to
8d5ad46
Compare
e11e157
to
0f9df05
Compare
[software] Load vector type in cmatmul_f16
5010e69
to
916a29a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Marco, this is very good merge request. I reviewed files and there almost nothing really need to futher changes, only very few suggestions. And also, something maybe we can do together with this merge:
- For the MatMul kernels. I saw the "conflict optimization" kernel (which I did during the PUSCH DATE) was included in matmul_f32, but it is not included the integar kernels, could you also help to copy-paste into the integar kernel file?
- Dont forget to update the "change log" file.
Thats all! Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is better to add a "#define local_parallel" instead of commenting the others out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same at this kernel, if we keep all of the kernels in this "main.c", we should add #define. Otherwise, we only leave one kernel instead of commenting others out. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you.
[Lint] Fix format error
82c5e0b
to
c2db140
Compare
c2db140
to
0f1de6f
Compare
Changelog
Added
Checklist
Please check our contributing guidelines before opening a Pull Request.