-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TeraPool merge request preview #82
Conversation
8e54dbe
to
2fd8463
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot Yichao. It looks already very good to me. I have a few comments and general questions.
- What prevents us from using generate statements instead of ifdefs when instantiating tera/mempool things?
- I see that the group is quite different, but for the cluster and the tile, could mempool just be the special case where we only have one subgroup per group? And then have the same instantiation of the modules and less code duplications?
a417c89
to
bce471f
Compare
…or TeraPool merge into MemPool
… and TeraPool support
…the DMA numbers for TeraPool
…le in Makefile and config files
b2866e6
to
7fcf586
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot. LGTM and ready to merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All good for me, thank you for fixing the barrier initialization.
Did you modify the Changelog?
Summarize the changes concisely.
Changelog
-Tile/Group/Cluster levels now could make by config for both TeraPool and MemPool;
-Add new Subgroup RTL;
Added
Changed
Fixed
(Reference to issues, labels, and related merge requests)
Checklist
Please check our contributing guidelines before opening a Pull Request.