Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix lint for Rust 1.84 #183

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

fix lint for Rust 1.84 #183

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

davidhewitt
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.71%. Comparing base (e6133c9) to head (0d288ee).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #183   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.71%   88.71%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        2206     2207    +1     
  Branches     2206     2207    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         1957     1958    +1     
  Misses        153      153           
  Partials       96       96           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
crates/jiter/src/py_string_cache.rs 93.22% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e6133c9...0d288ee. Read the comment docs.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 23, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #183 will not alter performance

Comparing dh/lint (0d288ee) with main (e6133c9)

Summary

✅ 73 untouched benchmarks

@davidhewitt davidhewitt merged commit 4cefa8b into main Jan 23, 2025
25 checks passed
@davidhewitt davidhewitt deleted the dh/lint branch January 23, 2025 09:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant