German translation update for Git 2.44 #7
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
|
Errors and warnings found by git-po-helper in workflow #10: |
ralfth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2024
Memory sanitizer (msan) is detecting a use of an uninitialized variable
(`size`) in `read_attr_from_index`:
==2268==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x5651f3416504 in read_attr_from_index git/attr.c:868:11
#1 0x5651f3415530 in read_attr git/attr.c
#2 0x5651f3413d74 in bootstrap_attr_stack git/attr.c:968:6
#3 0x5651f3413d74 in prepare_attr_stack git/attr.c:1004:2
#4 0x5651f3413d74 in collect_some_attrs git/attr.c:1199:2
#5 0x5651f3413144 in git_check_attr git/attr.c:1345:2
#6 0x5651f34728da in convert_attrs git/convert.c:1320:2
#7 0x5651f3473425 in would_convert_to_git_filter_fd git/convert.c:1373:2
#8 0x5651f357a35e in index_fd git/object-file.c:2630:34
#9 0x5651f357aa15 in index_path git/object-file.c:2657:7
#10 0x5651f35db9d9 in add_to_index git/read-cache.c:766:7
#11 0x5651f35dc170 in add_file_to_index git/read-cache.c:799:9
git-l10n#12 0x5651f321f9b2 in add_files git/builtin/add.c:346:7
git-l10n#13 0x5651f321f9b2 in cmd_add git/builtin/add.c:565:18
git-l10n#14 0x5651f321d327 in run_builtin git/git.c:474:11
git-l10n#15 0x5651f321bc9e in handle_builtin git/git.c:729:3
git-l10n#16 0x5651f321a792 in run_argv git/git.c:793:4
git-l10n#17 0x5651f321a792 in cmd_main git/git.c:928:19
git-l10n#18 0x5651f33dde1f in main git/common-main.c:62:11
The issue exists because `size` is an output parameter from
`read_blob_data_from_index`, but it's only modified if
`read_blob_data_from_index` returns non-NULL. The read of `size` when
calling `read_attr_from_buf` unconditionally may read from an
uninitialized value. `read_attr_from_buf` checks that `buf` is non-NULL
before reading from `size`, but by then it's already too late: the
uninitialized read will have happened already. Furthermore, there's no
guarantee that the compiler won't reorder things so that it checks
`size` before checking `!buf`.
Make the call to `read_attr_from_buf` conditional on `buf` being
non-NULL, ensuring that `size` is not read if it's never set.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ralfth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2024
It was recently reported that concurrent reads and writes may cause the
reftable backend to segfault. The root cause of this is that we do not
properly keep track of reftable readers across reloads.
Suppose that you have a reftable iterator and then decide to reload the
stack while iterating through the iterator. When the stack has been
rewritten since we have created the iterator, then we would end up
discarding a subset of readers that may still be in use by the iterator.
The consequence is that we now try to reference deallocated memory,
which of course segfaults.
One way to trigger this is in t5616, where some background maintenance
jobs have been leaking from one test into another. This leads to stack
traces like the following one:
+ git -c protocol.version=0 -C pc1 fetch --filter=blob:limit=29999 --refetch origin
AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
=================================================================
==657994==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x7fa0f0ec6089 (pc 0x55f23e52ddf9 bp
0x7ffe7bfa1700 sp 0x7ffe7bfa1700 T0)
==657994==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
#0 0x55f23e52ddf9 in get_var_int reftable/record.c:29
#1 0x55f23e53295e in reftable_decode_keylen reftable/record.c:170
#2 0x55f23e532cc0 in reftable_decode_key reftable/record.c:194
#3 0x55f23e54e72e in block_iter_next reftable/block.c:398
#4 0x55f23e5573dc in table_iter_next_in_block reftable/reader.c:240
#5 0x55f23e5573dc in table_iter_next reftable/reader.c:355
#6 0x55f23e5573dc in table_iter_next reftable/reader.c:339
#7 0x55f23e551283 in merged_iter_advance_subiter reftable/merged.c:69
#8 0x55f23e55169e in merged_iter_next_entry reftable/merged.c:123
#9 0x55f23e55169e in merged_iter_next_void reftable/merged.c:172
#10 0x55f23e537625 in reftable_iterator_next_ref reftable/generic.c:175
#11 0x55f23e2cf9c6 in reftable_ref_iterator_advance refs/reftable-backend.c:464
git-l10n#12 0x55f23e2d996e in ref_iterator_advance refs/iterator.c:13
git-l10n#13 0x55f23e2d996e in do_for_each_ref_iterator refs/iterator.c:452
git-l10n#14 0x55f23dca6767 in get_ref_map builtin/fetch.c:623
git-l10n#15 0x55f23dca6767 in do_fetch builtin/fetch.c:1659
git-l10n#16 0x55f23dca6767 in fetch_one builtin/fetch.c:2133
git-l10n#17 0x55f23dca6767 in cmd_fetch builtin/fetch.c:2432
git-l10n#18 0x55f23dba7764 in run_builtin git.c:484
git-l10n#19 0x55f23dba7764 in handle_builtin git.c:741
git-l10n#20 0x55f23dbab61e in run_argv git.c:805
git-l10n#21 0x55f23dbab61e in cmd_main git.c:1000
git-l10n#22 0x55f23dba4781 in main common-main.c:64
git-l10n#23 0x7fa0f063fc89 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
git-l10n#24 0x7fa0f063fd44 in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360
git-l10n#25 0x55f23dba6ad0 in _start (git+0xadfad0) (BuildId: 803b2b7f59beb03d7849fb8294a8e2145dd4aa27)
While it is somewhat awkward that the maintenance processes survive
tests in the first place, it is totally expected that reftables should
work alright with concurrent writers. Seemingly they don't.
The only underlying resource that we need to care about in this context
is the reftable reader, which is responsible for reading a single table
from disk. These readers get discarded immediately (unless reused) when
calling `reftable_stack_reload()`, which is wrong. We can only close
them once we know that there are no iterators using them anymore.
Prepare for a fix by converting the reftable readers to be refcounted.
Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ralfth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2024
This one is a little bit more curious. In t6112, we have a test that
exercises the `git rev-list --filter` option with invalid filters. We
execute git-rev-list(1) via `test_must_fail`, which means that we check
for leaks even though Git exits with an error code. This causes the
following leak:
Direct leak of 27 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x5555555e6946 in realloc.part.0 lsan_interceptors.cpp.o
#1 0x5555558fb4b6 in xrealloc wrapper.c:137:8
#2 0x5555558b6e06 in strbuf_grow strbuf.c:112:2
#3 0x5555558b7550 in strbuf_add strbuf.c:311:2
#4 0x5555557c1a88 in strbuf_addstr strbuf.h:310:2
#5 0x5555557c1d4c in parse_list_objects_filter list-objects-filter-options.c:261:3
#6 0x555555885ead in handle_revision_pseudo_opt revision.c:2899:3
#7 0x555555884e20 in setup_revisions revision.c:3014:11
#8 0x5555556c4b42 in cmd_rev_list builtin/rev-list.c:588:9
#9 0x5555555ec5e3 in run_builtin git.c:483:11
#10 0x5555555eb1e4 in handle_builtin git.c:749:13
#11 0x5555555ec001 in run_argv git.c:819:4
git-l10n#12 0x5555555eaf94 in cmd_main git.c:954:19
git-l10n#13 0x5555556fd569 in main common-main.c:64:11
git-l10n#14 0x7ffff7ca714d in __libc_start_call_main (.../lib/libc.so.6+0x2a14d)
git-l10n#15 0x7ffff7ca7208 in __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (.../libc.so.6+0x2a208)
git-l10n#16 0x5555555ad064 in _start (git+0x59064)
This leak is valid, as we call `die()` and do not clean up the memory at
all. But what's curious is that this is the only leak reported, because
we don't clean up any other allocated memory, either, and I have no idea
why the leak sanitizer treats this buffer specially.
In any case, we can work around the leak by shuffling things around a
bit. Instead of calling `gently_parse_list_objects_filter()` and dying
after we have modified the filter spec, we simply do so beforehand. Like
this we don't allocate the buffer in the error case, which makes the
reported leak go away.
It's not pretty, but it manages to make t6112 leak free.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ralfth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2025
There's a race with LSan when spawning threads and one of the threads
calls die(). We worked around one such problem with index-pack in the
previous commit, but it exists in git-grep, too. You can see it with:
make SANITIZE=leak THREAD_BARRIER_PTHREAD=YesOnLinux
cd t
./t0003-attributes.sh --stress
which fails pretty quickly with:
==git==4096424==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 32 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f906de14556 in realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98
#1 0x7f906dc9d2c1 in __pthread_getattr_np nptl/pthread_getattr_np.c:180
#2 0x7f906de2500d in __sanitizer::GetThreadStackTopAndBottom(bool, unsigned long*, unsigned long*) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:150
#3 0x7f906de25187 in __sanitizer::GetThreadStackAndTls(bool, unsigned long*, unsigned long*, unsigned long*, unsigned long*) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:614
#4 0x7f906de17d18 in __lsan::ThreadStart(unsigned int, unsigned long long, __sanitizer::ThreadType) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_posix.cpp:53
#5 0x7f906de143a9 in ThreadStartFunc<false> ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:431
#6 0x7f906dc9bf51 in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:447
#7 0x7f906dd1a677 in __clone3 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78
As with the previous commit, we can fix this by inserting a barrier that
makes sure all threads have finished their setup before continuing. But
there's one twist in this case: the thread which calls die() is not one
of the worker threads, but the main thread itself!
So we need the main thread to wait in the barrier, too, until all
threads have gotten to it. And thus we initialize the barrier for
num_threads+1, to account for all of the worker threads plus the main
one.
If we then test as above, t0003 should run indefinitely.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ralfth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2025
In 1b9e9be (csum-file.c: use unsafe SHA-1 implementation when available, 2024-09-26) we have converted our `struct hashfile` to use the unsafe SHA1 backend, which results in a significant speedup. One needs to be careful with how to use that structure now though because callers need to consistently use either the safe or unsafe variants of SHA1, as otherwise one can easily trigger corruption. As it turns out, we have one inconsistent usage in our tree because we directly initialize `struct hashfile_checkpoint::ctx` with the safe variant of SHA1, but end up writing to that context with the unsafe ones. This went unnoticed so far because our CI systems do not exercise different hash functions for these two backends, and consequently safe and unsafe variants are equivalent. But when using SHA1DC as safe and OpenSSL as unsafe backend this leads to a crash an t1050: ++ git -c core.compression=0 add large1 AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==1367==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000040 (pc 0x7ffff7a01a99 bp 0x507000000db0 sp 0x7fffffff5690 T0) ==1367==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==1367==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x7ffff7a01a99 in EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex (/nix/store/h1ydpxkw9qhjdxjpic1pdc2nirggyy6f-openssl-3.3.2/lib/libcrypto.so.3+0x201a99) (BuildId: 41746a580d39075fc85e8c8065b6c07fb34e97d4) #1 0x555555ddde56 in openssl_SHA1_Clone ../sha1/openssl.h:40:2 #2 0x555555dce2fc in git_hash_sha1_clone_unsafe ../object-file.c:123:2 #3 0x555555c2d5f8 in hashfile_checkpoint ../csum-file.c:211:2 #4 0x555555b9905d in deflate_blob_to_pack ../bulk-checkin.c:286:4 #5 0x555555b98ae9 in index_blob_bulk_checkin ../bulk-checkin.c:362:15 #6 0x555555ddab62 in index_blob_stream ../object-file.c:2756:9 #7 0x555555dda420 in index_fd ../object-file.c:2778:9 #8 0x555555ddad76 in index_path ../object-file.c:2796:7 #9 0x555555e947f3 in add_to_index ../read-cache.c:771:7 #10 0x555555e954a4 in add_file_to_index ../read-cache.c:804:9 #11 0x5555558b5c39 in add_files ../builtin/add.c:355:7 git-l10n#12 0x5555558b412e in cmd_add ../builtin/add.c:578:18 git-l10n#13 0x555555b1f493 in run_builtin ../git.c:480:11 git-l10n#14 0x555555b1bfef in handle_builtin ../git.c:740:9 git-l10n#15 0x555555b1e6f4 in run_argv ../git.c:807:4 git-l10n#16 0x555555b1b87a in cmd_main ../git.c:947:19 git-l10n#17 0x5555561649e6 in main ../common-main.c:64:11 git-l10n#18 0x7ffff742a1fb in __libc_start_call_main (/nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a1fb) (BuildId: bf320110569c8ec2425e9a0c5e4eb7e97f1fb6e4) git-l10n#19 0x7ffff742a2b8 in __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (/nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a2b8) (BuildId: bf320110569c8ec2425e9a0c5e4eb7e97f1fb6e4) git-l10n#20 0x555555772c84 in _start (git+0x21ec84) ==1367==Register values: rax = 0x0000511000001080 rbx = 0x0000000000000000 rcx = 0x000000000000000c rdx = 0x0000000000000000 rdi = 0x0000000000000000 rsi = 0x0000507000000db0 rbp = 0x0000507000000db0 rsp = 0x00007fffffff5690 r8 = 0x0000000000000000 r9 = 0x0000000000000000 r10 = 0x0000000000000000 r11 = 0x00007ffff7a01a30 r12 = 0x0000000000000000 r13 = 0x00007fffffff6b38 r14 = 0x00007ffff7ffd000 r15 = 0x00005555563b9910 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/nix/store/h1ydpxkw9qhjdxjpic1pdc2nirggyy6f-openssl-3.3.2/lib/libcrypto.so.3+0x201a99) (BuildId: 41746a580d39075fc85e8c8065b6c07fb34e97d4) in EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex ==1367==ABORTING ./test-lib.sh: line 1023: 1367 Aborted git $config add large1 error: last command exited with $?=134 not ok 4 - add with -c core.compression=0 Fix the issue by using the unsafe variant instead. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ralfth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2025
Same as with the preceding commit, git-fast-import(1) is using the safe
variant to initialize a hashfile checkpoint. This leads to a segfault
when passing the checkpoint into the hashfile subsystem because it would
use the unsafe variants instead:
++ git --git-dir=R/.git fast-import --big-file-threshold=1
AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
=================================================================
==577126==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000040 (pc 0x7ffff7a01a99 bp 0x5070000009c0 sp 0x7fffffff5b30 T0)
==577126==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
==577126==Hint: address points to the zero page.
#0 0x7ffff7a01a99 in EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex (/nix/store/h1ydpxkw9qhjdxjpic1pdc2nirggyy6f-openssl-3.3.2/lib/libcrypto.so.3+0x201a99) (BuildId: 41746a580d39075fc85e8c8065b6c07fb34e97d4)
#1 0x555555ddde56 in openssl_SHA1_Clone ../sha1/openssl.h:40:2
#2 0x555555dce2fc in git_hash_sha1_clone_unsafe ../object-file.c:123:2
#3 0x555555c2d5f8 in hashfile_checkpoint ../csum-file.c:211:2
#4 0x5555559647d1 in stream_blob ../builtin/fast-import.c:1110:2
#5 0x55555596247b in parse_and_store_blob ../builtin/fast-import.c:2031:3
#6 0x555555967f91 in file_change_m ../builtin/fast-import.c:2408:5
#7 0x55555595d8a2 in parse_new_commit ../builtin/fast-import.c:2768:4
#8 0x55555595bb7a in cmd_fast_import ../builtin/fast-import.c:3614:4
#9 0x555555b1f493 in run_builtin ../git.c:480:11
#10 0x555555b1bfef in handle_builtin ../git.c:740:9
#11 0x555555b1e6f4 in run_argv ../git.c:807:4
git-l10n#12 0x555555b1b87a in cmd_main ../git.c:947:19
git-l10n#13 0x5555561649e6 in main ../common-main.c:64:11
git-l10n#14 0x7ffff742a1fb in __libc_start_call_main (/nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a1fb) (BuildId: bf320110569c8ec2425e9a0c5e4eb7e97f1fb6e4)
git-l10n#15 0x7ffff742a2b8 in __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (/nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a2b8) (BuildId: bf320110569c8ec2425e9a0c5e4eb7e97f1fb6e4)
git-l10n#16 0x555555772c84 in _start (git+0x21ec84)
==577126==Register values:
rax = 0x0000511000000cc0 rbx = 0x0000000000000000 rcx = 0x000000000000000c rdx = 0x0000000000000000
rdi = 0x0000000000000000 rsi = 0x00005070000009c0 rbp = 0x00005070000009c0 rsp = 0x00007fffffff5b30
r8 = 0x0000000000000000 r9 = 0x0000000000000000 r10 = 0x0000000000000000 r11 = 0x00007ffff7a01a30
r12 = 0x0000000000000000 r13 = 0x00007fffffff6b60 r14 = 0x00007ffff7ffd000 r15 = 0x00005555563b9910
AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/nix/store/h1ydpxkw9qhjdxjpic1pdc2nirggyy6f-openssl-3.3.2/lib/libcrypto.so.3+0x201a99) (BuildId: 41746a580d39075fc85e8c8065b6c07fb34e97d4) in EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex
==577126==ABORTING
./test-lib.sh: line 1039: 577126 Aborted git --git-dir=R/.git fast-import --big-file-threshold=1 < input
error: last command exited with $?=134
not ok 167 - R: blob bigger than threshold
The segfault is only exposed in case the unsafe and safe backends are
different from one another.
Fix the issue by initializing the context with the unsafe SHA1 variant.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ralfth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2025
Our CI jobs sometimes see false positive leaks like this:
=================================================================
==3904583==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 32 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fa790d01986 in __interceptor_realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98
#1 0x7fa790add769 in __pthread_getattr_np nptl/pthread_getattr_np.c:180
#2 0x7fa790d117c5 in __sanitizer::GetThreadStackTopAndBottom(bool, unsigned long*, unsigned long*) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:150
#3 0x7fa790d11957 in __sanitizer::GetThreadStackAndTls(bool, unsigned long*, unsigned long*, unsigned long*, unsigned long*) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:598
#4 0x7fa790d03fe8 in __lsan::ThreadStart(unsigned int, unsigned long long, __sanitizer::ThreadType) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_posix.cpp:51
#5 0x7fa790d013fd in __lsan_thread_start_func ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:440
#6 0x7fa790adc3eb in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:444
#7 0x7fa790b5ca5b in clone3 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:81
This is not a leak in our code, but appears to be a race between one
thread calling exit() while another one is in LSan's stack setup code.
You can reproduce it easily by running t0003 or t5309 with --stress
(these trigger it because of the threading in git-grep and index-pack
respectively).
This may be a bug in LSan, but regardless of whether it is eventually
fixed, it is useful to work around it so that we stop seeing these false
positives.
We can recognize it by the mention of the sanitizer functions in the
DEDUP_TOKEN line. With this patch, the scripts mentioned above should
run with --stress indefinitely.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi team,
please review the German translation update for Git 2.44. There are 52 new/updated messages.
Git update windows closes on the 18th of Feb. so I'm going to send a PR to the Git l10n coordinator
one or two days before.
Thanks