Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use tool.scikit-build.cmake.version, set scikit-build-core minimum-version #258

Merged

Conversation

jameslamb
Copy link
Member

@jameslamb jameslamb commented Aug 7, 2024

Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#58.

scikit-build-core==0.10.0 was released today (https://github.com/scikit-build/scikit-build-core/releases/tag/v0.10.0), and wheel-building configurations across RAPIDS are incompatible with it.

This proposes upgrading to that version and fixing configuration here in a way that:

  • is compatible with that new scikit-build-core version
  • takes advantage of the forward-compatibility mechanism (minimum-version) that scikit-build-core provides, to reduce the risk of needing to do this again in the future

@jameslamb jameslamb changed the base branch from branch-0.39 to branch-0.40 August 7, 2024 14:26
@jameslamb jameslamb changed the title WIP: Use tool.scikit-build.cmake.version, set scikit-build-core minimum-version Use tool.scikit-build.cmake.version, set scikit-build-core minimum-version Aug 7, 2024
@jameslamb jameslamb marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2024 15:46
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from a team as a code owner August 7, 2024 15:46
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

A couple CI jobs appear to have failed. Not entirely clear why. Went ahead and restarted

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit a9e51de into rapidsai:branch-0.40 Aug 8, 2024
57 checks passed
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Thanks James! 🙏

@jameslamb jameslamb deleted the scikit-build-core-version branch August 8, 2024 13:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants