Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EPMRPP-89125 || Analyzer no any tooltip if invalid value #3738

Merged

Conversation

BlazarQSO
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (52a0900) 60.51% compared to head (e4e2b4c) 60.51%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3738   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    60.51%   60.51%           
========================================
  Files           79       79           
  Lines          861      861           
  Branches       126      126           
========================================
  Hits           521      521           
  Misses         313      313           
  Partials        27       27           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@AmsterGet AmsterGet merged commit 4ab3912 into develop Jan 30, 2024
8 checks passed
@AmsterGet AmsterGet deleted the fix/EPMRPP-89125-analyzer-no-any-tooltip-if-invalid-value branch January 30, 2024 18:35
Vadim73i pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
* EPMRPP-89125 || Analyzer no any tooltip if invalid value

* EPMRPP-89125 || Code Review fix - 1

(cherry picked from commit 4ab3912)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants