-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pylint enable #5486
Pylint enable #5486
Conversation
Hello @adamkankovsky! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:
Comment last updated at 2024-02-28 15:32:37 UTC |
550efed
to
b82038a
Compare
b82038a
to
7fb6ea7
Compare
7fb6ea7
to
eda8116
Compare
eda8116
to
d198f28
Compare
d198f28
to
8e82b0b
Compare
8e82b0b
to
9b9440e
Compare
9b9440e
to
788ec10
Compare
788ec10
to
580d308
Compare
580d308
to
3c0ad52
Compare
Infrastructure check failed on these files. Please do a double check of these files before merge! Makefile.am |
3c0ad52
to
e87e0ac
Compare
e87e0ac
to
1ccfdaf
Compare
51c586e
to
adddf6e
Compare
b25c486
to
5584e47
Compare
The infra prefix check is just broken for multi commit pRs. Please ignore it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great to me. Thanks a lot for this.
However, could you please take a look on the note above?
Honestly, I wonder why we have the requirement that all the infra commits have to have the |
Thats fine for consistency. The problem is that the check for 'infra' prefix requirements does not check each commit seperately but the PRs file changes as a whole, which is most often wrong. |
Invoking the standalone containerized pylint make target now also: - propagates error code - provides logs
The 'new' method exists on class Bytes, https://hackage.haskell.org/package/gi-glib-2.0.29/docs/GI-GLib-Structs-Bytes.html#g:method:new
Needed because of pylint-dev/astroid#2391
5584e47
to
bdff5fc
Compare
/kickstart-test --waive infra only |
I wrote it wrong. I meant why all the commits requires the I think we should change that. We don't want to have red tests. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Give me a sec I'm testing it locally. Because in the past we had a different result between local run and Actions run. |
After rebuild of the container image, the pylint test was successful for me. So I think you should be fine to merge this. 🎉 🎉 ⭐ |
Fetch of VladimirSlavik for the right to run the test.
Old PR:#5269