generated from riscv/docs-spec-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Derek Hower
committed
Apr 8, 2024
1 parent
1d660d1
commit 983176c
Showing
1 changed file
with
33 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
= Minutes for April 4, 2024 | ||
|
||
== Attendees | ||
|
||
* Derek Hower (Qualcomm) | ||
* Allen Baum (Esperanto) | ||
* Greg Favor (Ventana) | ||
* Philipp Tomsich (VRULL) | ||
* Daniel Bone (Imagination) | ||
* Al Martin (Akeana) | ||
* Ana Pazos (Qualcomm) | ||
* Christian Herber (NXP) | ||
* Rich Fulher (Andes) | ||
|
||
|
||
== Artifacts | ||
|
||
* https://github.com/riscv-admin/riscv-scalar-efficiency/commit/1d660d19fb3e4dcdd02419b01763f96d8cfe6619[Changes to charter] | ||
* https://lists.riscv.org/g/sig-scalar-efficiency/files/Presentations/Scalar%20Efficency%20SIG%20Kickoff%20-%2020240321.pdf[Slides] - We started at slide #5 | ||
|
||
== Topics | ||
|
||
Charter:: | ||
|
||
* Discussed SIG scope, specifically restriction to instructions "targetable by a compiler code generator or builtin function" | ||
** Concern that 'builtin' would be too restrictive, _e.g._, preventing consideration of instructions that target compression libraries. | ||
** *Reached agreement that SIG will target inline assembly instructions if those instructions are beneficial to more than one domain.* | ||
*** Instructions beneficial to a single domain are better handled by domain-specific SIG or TG. The Scalar Efficiency SIG can help facilitate that if needed. | ||
* Brief discussion on any overlap with Zilsd (fast-track RV32-only load double) | ||
** Derek concerned that there may be overlap with load/store pair. | ||
** Christian pointed out there is room for both; Zilsd instructions will be restricted to sequentual destination registers, re-use RV64 encodings, and will have the benefit of a 16-bit representation. A more general load/store pair would still be useful in RV32/RV64. | ||
** *Consensus that there is no issue with overlap.* | ||
* Derek presented template for TG timelines; see slides. |