Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove deprecated note on Zvknc / Zvksc + cleanup #112

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 28, 2023
Merged

Remove deprecated note on Zvknc / Zvksc + cleanup #112

Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
61a9b0e
Remove deprecated note on Zvknc / Zvksc + cleanup
nibrunieAtSi5 Jun 28, 2023
cdaa796
fixing Zvknc / Zvksc descriptions
nibrunieAtSi5 Jun 28, 2023
8768ccc
Update rvb23-profile.adoc
nibrunieAtSi5 Jun 28, 2023
dc20a88
Update rvb23-profile.adoc
nibrunieAtSi5 Jun 28, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 4 additions & 8 deletions rvb23-profile.adoc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -129,8 +129,6 @@ address space.
- *Zfa* Additional scalar FP instructions.
- *Zawrs* Wait on reservation set.

The following mandatory extensions are new in RVB23U64:

==== RVB23U64 Optional Extensions

RVB23U64 has 18 profile options listed below.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -164,14 +162,12 @@ The following options are optional in RVB23U64 but are not present in
RVA23U64:

- *Zvkg* Vector GHASH instructions
- *Zvkn* Vector Crypto NIST Algorithms
- *Zvks* Vector Crypto ShangMi Algorithms
- *Zvknc* Vector Crypto NIST Algorithms with carryless multiply
- *Zvksc* Vector Crypto ShangMi Algorithms with carryless multiply
nibrunieAtSi5 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved


but where either of Zvkn or Zvks is implemented, either Zvbc or Zvkg
must also be implemented.
NOTE: RVB mandates at least some support to implement GCM efficiently through either Zvbc or Zvkg if either of Zvkn or Zvks is implemented,
nibrunieAtSi5 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

NOTE: Should probably define new Zvknc and Zvksc extensions to
represent Zvknn + Zvbc and Zvsn + Zvbc respectively.

==== RVB23U64 Recommendations

Expand Down