Add schema #479
Add schema #479
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #479 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 0 41.06% +41.06%
===========================================
Files 0 18 +18
Lines 0 1936 +1936
===========================================
+ Hits 0 795 +795
- Misses 0 1077 +1077
- Partials 0 64 +64 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
nickdnk
force-pushed
the
schema
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0f86e3e
to
92f3460
Compare
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@nickdnk has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughA new Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
schema.json (2)
2-2: Consider using a versioned URL for schema $idUsing a branch reference (
refs/heads/master) in the schema $id could lead to breaking changes for consumers if the schema is modified. Consider using a version-specific URL (e.g.,/v1/schema.json) to ensure schema stability.
1-288: Consider adding schema versioningThe schema would benefit from:
- Adding a version field to track schema changes
- Creating a CHANGELOG.md to document schema evolution
- Including examples in the schema documentation
This helps with schema maintenance and backwards compatibility.
schema.json
Outdated
| "default": "AllISRAcks", | ||
| "enum": [ | ||
| "NoAck", | ||
| "LeaderAck", | ||
| "AllISRAck" | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix mismatch between default value and enum
The default value "AllISRAcks" doesn't match any of the allowed enum values. It should be "AllISRAck" to match the enum.
- "default": "AllISRAcks",
+ "default": "AllISRAck",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "default": "AllISRAcks", | |
| "enum": [ | |
| "NoAck", | |
| "LeaderAck", | |
| "AllISRAck" | |
| ] | |
| "default": "AllISRAck", | |
| "enum": [ | |
| "NoAck", | |
| "LeaderAck", | |
| "AllISRAck" | |
| ] |
| "access_key": { | ||
| "description": "AWS Access key ID", | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| }, | ||
| "secret_key": { | ||
| "description": "AWS Secret Access key ID", | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| }, | ||
| "session_token": { | ||
| "description": "SessionToken, if non-empty, is a session / security token to use for authentication. See the following link for more details: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/STS/latest/APIReference/welcome.html", | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for AWS credentials
For AWS MSK IAM authentication:
- When
mechanismis "aws_msk_iam", eitheraccess_keyandsecret_keyshould be required, or document how credentials are obtained from the environment. - Add a note about AWS credential best practices (e.g., using IAM roles instead of static credentials).
"mechanism": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["aws_msk_iam", "plain", "SCRAM-SHA-256", "SCRAM-SHA-512"]
},
+ "allOf": [{
+ "if": {
+ "properties": { "mechanism": { "const": "aws_msk_iam" } }
+ },
+ "then": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "required": ["access_key", "secret_key"]
+ },
+ {
+ "description": "When access_key and secret_key are not provided, credentials will be obtained from the AWS environment (ECS task role, EC2 instance profile, etc.)"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ }]Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| "username": { | ||
| "description": "Username for authentication.", | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| }, | ||
| "password": { | ||
| "description": "Password for authentication.", | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Schema should support environment variable references for credentials
The current schema only supports plain text credentials without any built-in mechanism for secure credential management. Given that:
- The schema supports various SASL mechanisms including SCRAM-SHA-256/512
- There's no existing support for environment variables or external secret references
- The codebase already has environment-related dependencies (godotenv)
Recommendations:
- Add
envVarfield to credential fields to support environment variable references - Example structure:
"username": {
"oneOf": [
{
"type": "string",
"description": "Direct username value"
},
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"envVar": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Environment variable containing the username"
}
}
}
]
}🔗 Analysis chain
Consider security implications for credential handling
The schema allows plain text credentials. Consider:
- Adding a note in descriptions about secure credential management practices
- Supporting environment variable references or external secret management
Let me analyze the results and gather more information to verify if there's any existing support for environment variables or secure credential management.
The first search revealed references to environment variables and secrets in the codebase, but I want to specifically check if there's any existing support for environment variables in the schema and if there's any documentation about credential management before making the final recommendation.
Let me do one final check to understand the full schema structure and any existing credential handling patterns.
This will help us understand if there are any existing patterns for credential handling in the schema and if there's any precedent for environment variable support before making the final recommendation.
Let me fix the regex and try one more time.
This should help us understand the authentication configuration context and any existing environment variable support patterns in the schema.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any existing patterns for secure credential handling
rg -i "env|secret|vault" .
Length of output: 3894
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for environment variable support patterns in the schema and related files
ast-grep --pattern 'env' schema.json
# Check for any documentation about credential handling
fd README.md . --exec cat {}
Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete schema structure around authentication
rg -A 10 -B 10 '"username":\s*{' schema.json
# Look for any existing environment variable patterns in configuration
rg -A 5 -B 5 'env|ENV|variable' schema.json
Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete schema structure around authentication
rg -A 10 -B 10 '"username": \{' schema.json
# Look for any environment variable patterns in the schema
cat schema.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 -E "(env|ENV|variable)"
Length of output: 813
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
schema.json (2)
1-5: Consider adding version information to the schemaWhile the schema is well-structured, consider adding a
versionfield to track schema changes over time. This helps with schema evolution and backward compatibility.
101-107: Add pattern validation for topic namesThe topics array should include pattern validation to ensure valid Kafka topic names.
Add a pattern constraint:
"items": { "type": "string" + "pattern": "^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$", + "minLength": 1, + "maxLength": 249 }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- schema.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
schema.json (4)
98-120: Add validation for message size relationshipThe previous review comment about validating the relationship between
max_fetch_message_sizeandmin_fetch_message_sizeis still valid.
197-207: Remove hardcoded broker addressesThe previous review comment about removing hardcoded broker addresses is still valid.
231-284: Add validation for AWS credentialsThe previous review comment about AWS MSK IAM authentication validation is still valid.
1-288: Overall schema structure looks goodThe schema provides comprehensive validation for Kafka configuration. While there are some suggested improvements, the overall structure is solid and follows JSON Schema best practices.
| "mechanism": { | ||
| "description": "Mechanism used for the authentication.", | ||
| "type": "string", | ||
| "enum": [ | ||
| "aws_msk_iam", | ||
| "plain", | ||
| "SCRAM-SHA-256", | ||
| "SCRAM-SHA-512" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation for SASL mechanism dependencies
The SASL mechanism selection should enforce required properties based on the selected mechanism:
plain,SCRAM-SHA-256,SCRAM-SHA-512requireusernameandpasswordaws_msk_iamrequires either AWS credentials or environment configuration
Add conditional validation:
"mechanism": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["aws_msk_iam", "plain", "SCRAM-SHA-256", "SCRAM-SHA-512"]
- }
+ },
+ "allOf": [{
+ "if": {
+ "properties": {
+ "mechanism": {
+ "enum": ["plain", "SCRAM-SHA-256", "SCRAM-SHA-512"]
+ }
+ }
+ },
+ "then": {
+ "required": ["username", "password"]
+ }
+ }]Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Reason for This PR
Add schema like discussed.
Description of Changes
Add schema.
License Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.
PR Checklist
[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.][Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]git commit -s).CHANGELOG.md.Summary by CodeRabbit
pipelineanddriverobjects, including configuration options for producers, consumers, and driver settings.