Add schema #175
Add schema #175
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #175 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 0 42.14% +42.14%
===========================================
Files 0 18 +18
Lines 0 1936 +1936
===========================================
+ Hits 0 816 +816
- Misses 0 1049 +1049
- Partials 0 71 +71 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WalkthroughA new JSON schema file, Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
schema.json (2)
8-13: Add description for the driver property.Adding a description would improve schema documentation.
"driver": { "type": "string", + "description": "Specifies the message queue driver. Must be 'nats' for this plugin.", "enum": [ "nats" ] },
19-27: Consider inlining referenced definitions instead of using raw GitHub URLs.The current implementation has several risks:
- References to master branch are unstable and can break
- GitHub raw URLs are subject to rate limiting
- External dependencies make the schema less reliable
Consider copying the referenced definitions into this schema. If you'd like, I can help retrieve and inline these definitions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- schema.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
schema.json (1)
17-18: Consider adding common NATS configuration options.The schema might benefit from additional configuration options that are commonly needed:
- Connection settings (URLs, credentials)
- Queue group configuration
- Acknowledgment timeout
- Retry policy
Let's check if these settings exist elsewhere in the codebase:
schema.json
Outdated
| { | ||
| "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/schema", | ||
| "title": "roadrunner-nats", | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "description": "The schema contains all the valid configuration parameters for the NATS plugin for the roadrunner job system.", | ||
| "additionalProperties": false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add required properties to enforce mandatory fields.
The schema should specify which properties are required to prevent invalid configurations.
Add the following after line 6:
"additionalProperties": false,
+ "required": ["driver", "config"],
"properties": {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/schema", | |
| "title": "roadrunner-nats", | |
| "type": "object", | |
| "description": "The schema contains all the valid configuration parameters for the NATS plugin for the roadrunner job system.", | |
| "additionalProperties": false, | |
| { | |
| "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/schema", | |
| "title": "roadrunner-nats", | |
| "type": "object", | |
| "description": "The schema contains all the valid configuration parameters for the NATS plugin for the roadrunner job system.", | |
| "additionalProperties": false, | |
| "required": ["driver", "config"], |
schema.json
Outdated
| "subject": { | ||
| "description": "NATS subject", | ||
| "type": "string", | ||
| "default": "default" | ||
| }, | ||
| "stream": { | ||
| "description": "NATS stream", | ||
| "type": "string", | ||
| "default": "default-stream" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add pattern validation for subject and stream names.
NATS subjects and streams typically follow specific naming conventions. Consider adding pattern validation to ensure valid names.
"subject": {
"description": "NATS subject",
"type": "string",
+ "pattern": "^[a-zA-Z0-9-_.>*]+$",
"default": "default"
},
"stream": {
"description": "NATS stream",
"type": "string",
+ "pattern": "^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$",
"default": "default-stream"
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "subject": { | |
| "description": "NATS subject", | |
| "type": "string", | |
| "default": "default" | |
| }, | |
| "stream": { | |
| "description": "NATS stream", | |
| "type": "string", | |
| "default": "default-stream" | |
| }, | |
| "subject": { | |
| "description": "NATS subject", | |
| "type": "string", | |
| "pattern": "^[a-zA-Z0-9-_.>*]+$", | |
| "default": "default" | |
| }, | |
| "stream": { | |
| "description": "NATS stream", | |
| "type": "string", | |
| "pattern": "^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$", | |
| "default": "default-stream" | |
| }, |
schema.json
Outdated
| "rate_limit": { | ||
| "description": "Consumer rate-limiter in bytes. See https://docs.nats.io/jetstream/concepts/consumers#ratelimit", | ||
| "type": "integer", | ||
| "default": 1000, | ||
| "minimum": 0 | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance rate_limit property definition.
The rate_limit property could benefit from additional constraints and clearer documentation.
"rate_limit": {
- "description": "Consumer rate-limiter in bytes. See https://docs.nats.io/jetstream/concepts/consumers#ratelimit",
+ "description": "Consumer rate-limiter in bits per second. Examples: 1000 (1kb/s), 1000000 (1mb/s). Set to 0 to disable rate limiting.",
"type": "integer",
"default": 1000,
- "minimum": 0
+ "minimum": 0,
+ "maximum": 1073741824,
+ "examples": [1000, 1000000]
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "rate_limit": { | |
| "description": "Consumer rate-limiter in bytes. See https://docs.nats.io/jetstream/concepts/consumers#ratelimit", | |
| "type": "integer", | |
| "default": 1000, | |
| "minimum": 0 | |
| }, | |
| "rate_limit": { | |
| "description": "Consumer rate-limiter in bits per second. Examples: 1000 (1kb/s), 1000000 (1mb/s). Set to 0 to disable rate limiting.", | |
| "type": "integer", | |
| "default": 1000, | |
| "minimum": 0, | |
| "maximum": 1073741824, | |
| "examples": [1000, 1000000] | |
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
schema.json (1)
25-33: Consider adding examples for referenced properties.The referenced properties (priority, prefetch, consume_all) would benefit from examples in their descriptions to improve usability.
Consider adding examples like:
"priority": { + "examples": [1, 2, 3], "$ref": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roadrunner-server/jobs/refs/heads/master/schema.json#/definitions/PipelineProperties/priority" },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- schema.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
schema.json (5)
1-5: LGTM! Schema metadata is well-defined.The schema metadata follows best practices with proper $id, $schema declarations, and clear documentation.
9-11: Add "config" to required properties.The "config" object contains essential configuration parameters and should be required to prevent incomplete configurations.
34-43: Add pattern validation for subject and stream names.
49-54: Enhance rate_limit property definition.
1-82: Verify schema against existing configurations.Let's verify this schema against existing NATS configurations in the codebase to ensure it covers all use cases.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to find NATS configurations and validate the schema coverage.
This script will:
- Search for NATS configurations in test files with surrounding context
- Look for examples in documentation
- Check source code for any additional NATS-related configuration properties
The results will help us verify if the schema covers all supported configuration options.
Let me check the test configurations to verify the schema against actual usage patterns.
This will help us verify if there are any configuration patterns in the test files that might not be covered by the schema.
Let me try one final verification by checking the actual test files directly:
This will help us verify both the test configurations and the actual configuration structure in the code.
Based on the comprehensive verification of the schema against test configurations and the actual implementation, I can now provide the final response:
Schema accurately represents NATS configuration options
The schema correctly captures all configuration properties used in the codebase:
- Global configuration:
addr- Pipeline configuration:
- Basic properties:
priority,prefetch,consume_all- NATS-specific:
subject,stream,deliver_new,rate_limit,delete_stream_on_stop,delete_after_ackAll properties in the schema match the actual implementation in
config.goand are actively used in test configurations. The schema's types, defaults, and descriptions are accurate and well-documented.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for NATS configuration files and validate against schema echo "Searching for NATS configuration files..." fd -e yaml -e yml -e json | while read -r file; do if rg -q "driver.*:.*nats" "$file"; then echo "Found potential NATS config in: $file" cat "$file" fi doneLength of output: 469
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for NATS configuration examples in test files and documentation echo "=== Checking test files ===" rg -A 10 -B 10 "driver.*nats" tests/ || true echo -e "\n=== Checking documentation and examples ===" fd README -t f | xargs cat || true echo -e "\n=== Checking for additional NATS configuration properties ===" rg -A 5 "nats" -g "*.go" || trueLength of output: 30444
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "=== Checking test configurations ===" fd -e yaml -g "configs/.rr-nats-*.yaml" tests/ | while read -r file; do echo "=== Content of $file ===" cat "$file" doneLength of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "=== Checking NATS test files ===" cat tests/configs/.rr-nats-*.yaml || true echo -e "\n=== Checking NATS driver implementation for config properties ===" ast-grep --pattern 'type config struct { $$$ }' natsjobs/config.goLength of output: 9282
| "addr": { | ||
| "description": "NATS server address.", | ||
| "type": "string", | ||
| "default": "nats://127.0.0.1:4222" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance addr property validation and documentation.
The addr property should validate NATS URLs and provide examples of common configurations.
"addr": {
"description": "NATS server address.",
"type": "string",
+ "pattern": "^nats://[^\\s]+$",
"default": "nats://127.0.0.1:4222",
+ "examples": [
+ "nats://127.0.0.1:4222",
+ "nats://username:password@localhost:4222",
+ "nats://cluster.example.com:4222"
+ ]
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "addr": { | |
| "description": "NATS server address.", | |
| "type": "string", | |
| "default": "nats://127.0.0.1:4222" | |
| } | |
| "addr": { | |
| "description": "NATS server address.", | |
| "type": "string", | |
| "pattern": "^nats://[^\\s]+$", | |
| "default": "nats://127.0.0.1:4222", | |
| "examples": [ | |
| "nats://127.0.0.1:4222", | |
| "nats://username:password@localhost:4222", | |
| "nats://cluster.example.com:4222" | |
| ] | |
| } |
Reason for This PR
Add schema like discussed.
Description of Changes
Add json schema.
License Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.
PR Checklist
[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.][Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]git commit -s).CHANGELOG.md.Summary by CodeRabbit