Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add JSON schema #73

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024
Merged

feat: Add JSON schema #73

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

nickdnk
Copy link
Member

@nickdnk nickdnk commented Oct 24, 2024

Reason for This PR

Add JSON schema.

Description of Changes

Add JSON schema.

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.

PR Checklist

[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.]
[Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]

  • All commits in this PR are signed (git commit -s).
  • The reason for this PR is clearly provided (issue no. or explanation).
  • The description of changes is clear and encompassing.
  • Any required documentation changes (code and docs) are included in this PR.
  • Any user-facing changes are mentioned in CHANGELOG.md.
  • All added/changed functionality is tested.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new JSON schema for configuring the Service plugin for RoadRunner, enhancing clarity and validation of service parameters.
  • Documentation
    • Added detailed descriptions for configuration properties, improving user understanding of service setup options.

@nickdnk nickdnk added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 24, 2024
@nickdnk nickdnk self-assigned this Oct 24, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@nickdnk has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf33831 and 600b8ae.

Walkthrough

A new JSON schema file, schema.json, has been introduced for the configuration parameters of the Service plugin for RoadRunner. This schema defines the structure and validation rules for service configurations, including required and optional properties. It ensures that user-defined services are properly structured and that additional properties outside of specified patterns are disallowed.

Changes

File Change Summary
schema.json Introduced a new JSON schema defining configuration parameters for the Service plugin, including properties like command, env, timeout_stop_sec, process_num, exec_timeout, remain_after_exit, restart_sec, and service_name_in_log. Enforces validation rules and structure.

Poem

In the fields where services play,
A schema blooms, brightening the day.
With commands and timeouts in line,
Our plugin's ready, oh so fine!
Restart and log, all set to go,
Hopping along, watch our features grow! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
schema.json (1)

10-10: Consider a more restrictive pattern for service names

The current pattern allows names that might be confusing or problematic (e.g., starting with dots/dashes, consecutive special characters). Consider a more restrictive pattern:

- "^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$": {
+ "^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]+(?:[._-][a-zA-Z0-9]+)*$": {

This ensures:

  • Names start with a letter
  • Special characters can't be consecutive
  • Special characters can't appear at the end
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d2897e and cf33831.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • schema.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
schema.json (1)

65-67: Verify schema integration with the codebase

The schema looks well-structured. Let's verify its integration with the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Schema is properly integrated and used in the codebase

The schema is actively used in the codebase with proper implementation:

  • Config struct in config.go matches the schema structure with Services map[string]*Service
  • Service struct fields align with schema properties using mapstructure tags
  • Configuration is properly unmarshaled via UnmarshalKey in plugin.go
  • Service processes are created and managed based on this configuration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify schema integration and usage

# Test 1: Check if schema is referenced in Go code
echo "Checking for schema usage in Go code..."
rg -t go "schema.*\.json" -A 5

# Test 2: Look for example configurations that should validate against this schema
echo "Looking for example configurations..."
fd -e yaml -e json --exec grep -l "service"

Length of output: 301


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive verification approach

# Check for any JSON schema validation code
echo "Checking for JSON schema validation patterns..."
rg -t go "json\.Valid|json\.Schema|jsonschema" -A 5

# Look for imports or uses of JSON schema validation libraries
echo "Checking for schema validation imports..."
rg "github.com.*json.*schema|encoding/json"

# Check the actual content of schema.json
echo "Checking schema.json content..."
cat schema.json

# Look for configuration loading or parsing code
echo "Looking for config loading code..."
rg -t go "LoadConfig|ParseConfig|ReadConfig" -A 5

Length of output: 3189


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for actual service plugin implementation and configuration usage

# Look for service plugin initialization and configuration
echo "Checking for service plugin code..."
rg -t go "type Service struct" -A 10

# Look for configuration struct definitions
echo "Checking for config structs..."
ast-grep --pattern 'type Config struct {
  $$$
}'

# Check for JSON unmarshaling or config validation
echo "Checking for config validation..."
rg -t go "UnmarshalJSON|Validate|ValidateConfig" -A 5

# Look for plugin registration
echo "Looking for plugin registration..."
rg -t go "Plugin.*Service|NewService" -A 5

Length of output: 2823

schema.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
schema.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
schema.json Show resolved Hide resolved
schema.json Show resolved Hide resolved
schema.json Show resolved Hide resolved
Minor adjustments
@nickdnk nickdnk merged commit 0ff166f into master Oct 25, 2024
7 checks passed
@nickdnk nickdnk deleted the schema branch October 25, 2024 02:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants