Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Update list of reviewers #386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2023

Conversation

christophfroehlich
Copy link
Contributor

I created a python script parsing closed reviews of a repository and making some statistics:
reviewers_ros-controls_ros2_control_demos_2023-12-04.csv

Thanks for the work of lots of active reviewers!

But to make that process more efficient, I removed all reviewers from the list which
a) never finished any review
b) haven't reviewed anything in 2023

Additionally, I promote the following reviewers having already more than approx. 10 reviews and being still active :)
@fmauch
@moriarty
@olivier-stasse
@saikishor
(I think they have to be added to the organisation as well)

@bmagyar bmagyar merged commit 01dadce into ros-controls:master Dec 11, 2023
18 checks passed
@christophfroehlich christophfroehlich deleted the ci/reviewer_lottery branch December 11, 2023 19:05
@christophfroehlich
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio backport humble

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 12, 2023

backport humble

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2023
(cherry picked from commit 01dadce)

# Conflicts:
#	.github/reviewer-lottery.yml
christophfroehlich added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2023
* Update list of reviewers (#386)

(cherry picked from commit 01dadce)

---------

Co-authored-by: Christoph Fröhlich <christophfroehlich@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants