Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

image_view: consistent image_transport #876

Merged

Conversation

mikeferguson
Copy link
Member

All of these nodes already have the proper remapping support - but image_transport parameter support was scattered

this->declare_parameter<std::string>("transport", std::string("raw"));
std::string transport = this->get_parameter("transport").as_string();
// TransportHints does not actually declare the parameter
this->declare_parameter<std::string>("image_transport", std::string("raw"));
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NOTE: if we back port this - we probably need to revert the change in name of this parameter

@@ -75,13 +75,15 @@ ExtractImagesNode::ExtractImagesNode(const rclcpp::NodeOptions & options)
auto node_base = this->get_node_base_interface();
std::string topic = node_base->resolve_topic_or_service_name("image", false);

this->declare_parameter<std::string>("transport", std::string("raw"));
// TransportHints does not actually declare the parameter
this->declare_parameter<std::string>("image_transport", "raw");
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here - renamed parameter for consistency with image_transport specification - I've noted both instances of this in my Jazzy: Documentation ticket so we can mention the changed parameter name

Copy link
Contributor

@ahcorde ahcorde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

linters

- image_view.cpplint whitespace/line_length [2] (/__w/image_pipeline/image_pipeline/src/image_view/src/video_recorder_node.cpp:79)

@mikeferguson mikeferguson changed the title image_view: consistent image_transport support image_view: consistent image_transport Jan 19, 2024
@mikeferguson mikeferguson merged commit a2fb282 into ros-perception:rolling Jan 19, 2024
3 checks passed
@mikeferguson mikeferguson deleted the image_view_transport branch January 19, 2024 16:06
Kotochleb pushed a commit to Kotochleb/image_pipeline that referenced this pull request May 27, 2024
All of these nodes already have the proper remapping support - but
image_transport parameter support was scattered
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants