Fix latex rendering in sage-shell-view

[apresta]

This fixes issue #61.
Adapted from PR #70 with @aikrahguzar's help.

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

That's a better alternative than #72. However, it requires some documentation, and a default (initial) value.

I retracted (closed) #72.

Thanks !

[apresta]

@EmmanuelCharpentier sounds good, thanks.
Can you please clarify what needs documenting and an initial value?

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

Can you please clarify what needs documenting and an initial value?

• Document why this variable may be useful and what is its default value
• Possibly give an example of customization (I have trouble thinking one...).

HTH,

[apresta]

This PR doesn't introduce any new variable, it actually deletes sage-shell-view-latex-math-environment which is no longer needed.

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

This PR doesn't introduce any new variable, it actually deletes sage-shell-view-latex-math-environment which is no longer needed.

Wups ! I reverse-read your patch....

Deepest apologies !

[apresta]

No problem!

[hivert]

Thanks a lot for this work ! Any show stopper merging this one ? Having to type "view(...)" each time and switching to my browser seriously disrupt my workflow.

[dimpase]

@EmmanuelCharpentier - I've promoted you to a maintainer of this repo, you can merge things now.

[dimpase]

@hivert - I can promote you to maintainer of this repo too - would you like to be one?

[hivert]

@hivert - I can promote you to maintainer of this repo too - would you like to be one?

First of all, thank for the proposition !

If I'd definitely like to help, I'm still at the script-kiddie level concerning emacs internals and lisp programming. I don't think I'm knowledgeable enough for the task. Sorry...

[dimpase]

@hivert - well, I suppose you can test things, and that's good enough. Of course I can merge this without looking (I haven't been using emacs for 20 years), but that's not as good.

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

@EmmanuelCharpentier - I've promoted you to a maintainer of this repo, you can merge things now.

Thanks ! I'll do that (I've reviewed this patch already, and I'm using it currently).

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

I just accepted the merge. It should appear on Melpa in a not too long time. Bug me if that doesn't happen.

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

Well...

• This PR did reach MELPA.
• The resulting package :
  • does plot in the Sage buffer, but
  • dos not typeset LaTeX.

whereas my local branch does. I'll investigate.

[EmmanuelCharpentier]

Could you please review this pull request which reintegrates @apresta 's fix, which somehow disappeared from the previous pull request I merged (after successfully reviewing its branch) ?

Thanks again...