Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency @sanity/visual-editing-csm to ^2.0.1 #8373

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 22, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/visual-editing-csm (source) ^2.0.0 -> ^2.0.1 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2025 17:19
@renovate renovate bot requested review from bjoerge and removed request for a team January 22, 2025 17:19
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge January 22, 2025 17:19
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 22, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 22, 2025 6:00pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 22, 2025 6:00pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 22, 2025 6:00pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 22, 2025 6:00pm
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 22, 2025 6:00pm

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Jan 22, 2025 5:48 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (1) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 4s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 20s 5 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 51s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 25s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 7s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 29s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 2s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 43s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Wed, 22 Jan 2025 17:50:26 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 22.0 efps (46ms) 23.0 efps (44ms) -2ms (-4.4%)
article (body) 63.3 efps (16ms) 63.5 efps (16ms) -0ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 23.5 efps (43ms) 24.1 efps (42ms) -1ms (-2.4%)
article (string inside array) 20.8 efps (48ms) 21.7 efps (46ms) -2ms (-4.2%)
recipe (name) 50.0 efps (20ms) 52.6 efps (19ms) -1ms (-5.0%)
recipe (description) 55.6 efps (18ms) 58.8 efps (17ms) -1ms (-5.6%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (5ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) -0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 20.0 efps (50ms) 19.2 efps (52ms) +2ms (+4.0%)
synthetic (string inside object) 18.9 efps (53ms) 20.0 efps (50ms) -3ms (-5.7%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 46ms 72ms 88ms 562ms 1198ms 11.7s
article (body) 16ms 19ms 25ms 193ms 263ms 5.8s
article (string inside object) 43ms 45ms 52ms 283ms 184ms 7.2s
article (string inside array) 48ms 49ms 54ms 87ms 370ms 7.5s
recipe (name) 20ms 22ms 23ms 33ms 0ms 7.1s
recipe (description) 18ms 20ms 26ms 37ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 9ms 19ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 50ms 53ms 67ms 289ms 718ms 12.4s
synthetic (string inside object) 53ms 55ms 66ms 309ms 791ms 7.9s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 44ms 65ms 75ms 499ms 1044ms 11.2s
article (body) 16ms 19ms 27ms 230ms 313ms 5.9s
article (string inside object) 42ms 45ms 50ms 270ms 331ms 7.3s
article (string inside array) 46ms 48ms 64ms 78ms 408ms 7.5s
recipe (name) 19ms 21ms 23ms 36ms 3ms 7.5s
recipe (description) 17ms 18ms 19ms 28ms 0ms 4.3s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 8ms 13ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 52ms 54ms 62ms 268ms 931ms 12.7s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 52ms 56ms 318ms 711ms 8.4s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sanity-visual-editing-csm-2.x branch from 347ba67 to f92d08f Compare January 22, 2025 17:37
@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 22, 2025
Merged via the queue into next with commit 2e02240 Jan 22, 2025
32 of 36 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/sanity-visual-editing-csm-2.x branch January 22, 2025 17:40
juice49 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2025
…8373)

Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant