-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VN missing pages #39
Comments
No, I was saying V1-V4 and V6 to be missing, which are small.
The large portions that are in V5 and V7 are in the text already. BTW, I found a scan by Cologne itself that has a very small portion in V5, indicating corrections to the VN pages in it. This portion is missing, but seen that almost all these (except one or two entries) are present in V7 VN pages again. Reason UNKNOWN. |
You should go through all my posts at this PWG 37. (No need to type these VN pages now, but just to bring them into the current format. These are all, except the above mentioned V5 one, lying in the original typed format in one place.) Looks like you are reading them (my posts) just one at a time!! |
This is the "extra" page from PWG Vol.5, that I was talking about above. All other versions of scans and the physical book have this page. |
Volume 7 supplements cumulative.
Discussed this with Thomas. Here is my understanding. Volume 7 supplement is cumulative; in particular, it contains supplements from previous volumes. We can test this by comparing the above pdf from vol.5 (841) to the V7 VN pages. Some examples follow: Example 1: ativartavyaV5 almost same as V7 Vol 7: Page 7-1691 Example 2: utpuMsayV5 same as V7 Vol 7 7-1715 Example 3: pAriBAzikaHere, there is a difference between vol 5 and vol 7 supplements: Vol 7 7-1770 |
pwgheader vol 5pwgheader has TODO: full comparison of v5 to v7It would be a useful exercise to compare all of v5 to see if any others are like pAriBAzika (i.e. where v7 differs materially from v7). |
Vol 6 VNFrom pwgheader, there are 60 entries in pwg6 (search 'Page06' in pwgheader)
Preliminary conclusion is that VN7 contains the material from VN6. |
VN1The pwgheader file under 'pwg1' agrees with PWG.V.1.VN.pages.pdf. line 9 agree with the first 2 pages of the pdf. as does the next very long line of I will continue this comparison with VN7 tomorrow. |
the 'extra' page of volume 5.This comment refers to Pages from Vol.5 (841).pdf. As can be seen, this is at the bottom of page 1677-78. Here is a link to the Cologne PWG scans at page 1677 Note the 'next' page is 6-0001 (beginning of volume 6). So, this 5-1677/8 is the last page of volume 5, acc. to Cologne scans. I don't know where the number '841' comes from. Note the 'pwg5' items in pwgheader digitize the items identified as vebesserungen (corrections) at bottom of page 5-1677-78. Note Page 5-1677/8 is the last of a massive VN (correction/addition) section for volumes 1-5 which starts at The supplemental entries start with headword 'a' on 5-0941 and end with headword 'mluc' on 6-1678. All these supplemental entries are digitized and already part of the current Cologne digitization pwg.txt. The handful of entries (ativartavya, etc.) at the bottom of 5-1677 are digitized (in pwgheader) but are not part of pwg.txt. I think it would be consistent with current handling to insert ativartavya, etc. in the digitization just after 'mluc', as |
@Andhrabharati - Are they somewhere on Cologne server? or did you scan them? |
I have the physical books with me; but I did not have to scan them, as I have collected multiple scans as available on the net and also from few private personal collections. I guess you too can get most of these scans from Archive.org and Google books. |
BTW, I have corrected all the VN lines belonging to those 1000+ lines I mentioned above. The typed text had many errors. If you wish, I can post my file here. |
Yes, please post your corrected lines here. |
Here it is- |
I had stopped working any more, taking that you might not be liking the way of my work and posts (as there was no reaction from you for almost two months- even after you had switched to other works from the AP90 in which you mentioned to be deeply inside to do any other work). |
I've uploaded your file here. It looks to be closely comparable to the text of pwgheader.txt, but with formatting differences. Do you have a way to determine which of the 600+ lines have corrections to the 'many errors' you mention. |
I think you make many good observations. It is, however, often difficult to make use of these good observations because As to the style of your posts, I would say you have become less aggressive in comparison to several months ago; and I appreciate that, and hope the style of your posts becomes even more friendly and collaborative over time. |
Location of VN material - more details (vols 1-4)Some details regarding the untyped VN from volumes 1-4 and 6.
|
These are the lines from pwg_orig.txt as I had mentioned above. Once I found these typed, did a quick proofing of them (after converting them to Devanagari and MY formatting as done on the other text) as they are just about 10pp. to look at. There is no way to find the changed lines, except doing a "compare" in the text editor, after stripping off the formatting in both my file and Cologne text. |
As I haven't got the converted files (VCP, AP90, and now PWG) from you when asked, I have got the conversion done at my end and hence did all the formatting changes as per our (AB) process; otherwise they would've been straightaway usable to you, as the MW99 of which you had done the IAST conversion for me. [Probably you should generate all the Cologne .txt files in Devanagari at once, and upload them to this Github repo, so that I don't need to ask for them individually (when attempting the same) and then resort to my conversion when not getting a response from your side "in time". This is the only way I see, to cater to your concern in using my files.] |
The Sp. here is nothing but the number over the left and right columns (Spalte) in each print page. Pl. see my post at #22 (comment) |
Thanks for clarification of 'Sp.' in these cases. |
For me to make the greatest use of your analysis, your contributions need to be compatible with the existing digitization
I think it should be your responsibility as a contributor to present results that satisfy such compatibility criteria. It should be our (my) responsibility to provide tools (python programs) to you that will help you convert from the Would you be willing to run Python programs locally ? If so, I can work to develop a 'pwg_transcode.py' program And perhaps other programs (relating to those 'other dictionary specifics') as our collaboration progresses. |
I have already finished doing quite a large amount of cleaning and formatting during last few weeks on PWG in my style, and I highly doubt if all that can be done all over again. So probably the collaboration may not be possible in this work, in the process you are suggesting. |
Location of VN material - more details (vols 5-7)This concludes the table above
|
Sorry to hear that. How do you suggest I might be able to make use of your PWG work? |
You may just take some 'pointers' as from my AP90 work, in this PWG as well. But you can surely be able to use the ls data, which I would've finished in just another 4-5 days' time, had I not stopped it midway. And this was what you had asked initially, though I have progressed way ahead than that. |
See p. 3112 of this 4779 pp. PDF |
Please post your revisions when it is convenient to you.
Thanks for finding. Don't know how I missed it. Odd that the corrections for volume 6 occur at the beginning of the volume. |
see my comment as posted earlier- |
In #37, there is begun discussion of the supplementary sections of PWG. If I understood @Andhrabharati properly,
only volume 5 VN section is typed as part of pwg digitization.
Can we develop a plan of how to
a) digitize (type) the missing VN pages and
b) make use of the digitization
Let's constrain that discussion here.
I think @sanskritisampada can help with the typing, but we must develop the required format.
@Andhrabharati Can you design the format in which the text should be typed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: