-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Links to MBH Calcutta edition #48
Comments
Hurray! Hope Harivamsa follows and Ramayana is waiting in the line. That's amazing to see it come alive. |
@Andhrabharati
The other two noted mistakes to be discussed in separate comments below. |
you may take this- And you would get the missing pp. 498-9 as well from this archive book. |
Now that a format is (kind of) known, you may put your 'new' Russian 'team' on Harivamsa and Ramayana indexing. |
I have 1659 occurrences of And there are ~7800 series of MBH. x1,y1. x2,y2. occurrences in the main text and ~100 in the VN pages that need to be separately linked. |
Vana Parva verses on p. 517The above reference notes:
consistency with PWG
These examples suggest that the verse numbering in PWG (Vana Parva) is consistent with that in this |
Three variances to above
Under ftu, p. 1-1053, 11 lines from bottom Under garhaRIya, p. 2-0708, 8 lines from bottom Under x, p. 6-0401 |
Just like to tell that the excel file has one additional column with some details, as Remarks. This column is not copied in the txt file. [And I seem to have done few 'unwanted' corrections in the 'To' verse numbers (trying to 'correct' them properly); all such can be reverted to the 'book numbers' looking at the Remarks column, or might even be completely ignored (as they can be derived from the next page starting verse number).] |
This is a printo for 1,3402. And the quoted text does not refer to MBH, but to M. 3,46.
This is a printo for 5,3888. |
print error?
So Ramayana left? |
Just did a quick search, to see if there are any more in the range MBH. 3,3100-3999; and found that
|
And here are the pages, where some 'jumpimg' of numbering is seen and marked in my excel file-
The data is slightly reformatted, for quick comprehension. |
I remember seeing this 'printo' used somewhere long back. As it rhymed with the popular 'typo' (typographical error in typed documents), I've been using this 'printo' as a short form for 'print error' (for errors in printed books) since then. |
Regarding the other 'jumps', I also made a list of 'verse gaps', based on your pdf remarks:
|
Use archive.org source for 3.498, 3.499 and 3.727. Ref: sanskrit-lexicon/PWG#48
Page changesAdded 3.498, 3.499 from archive.org version. Also corrected a file-name error in pdf page renaming.
|
Links now active for PWGExample: https://sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/simple/pwg/guru |
glad to see this. you may link the pwk citations also, alongwith mw. |
implementationThe url form of the display is
This displays the pdf of the page containing the given verse for the given parvan. All the 3000+ page pdfs are in the repository https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon-scans/mbhcalc. |
MW citationsThere are at least some MW citations of the form |
PW(K) citationsAFAIK, the PWK MBH citations are to the BOMBAY edition of Mahabharata. They have the form 'MBH. x,y,z' (Three numbers). Not sure if there other PWK citations to Calcutta edition of MBH. |
known work to do
I'll open other issues for the 2nd and 3rd items. Hope @gasyoun crew will be able to help with the verse-page index for Harivamsa. Probably best for me to do the 3rd item. |
Hello! Thank you, but could you please explain how the number of the parvan is established? |
parvan-number correspondence
We are using a 4-volume pdf for this Calcutta edition. The parvan names and numbers can be seen on title page. Note that in the 4th volume, there is a 19th parvan for Harivansha. Note that this numbering is consistent with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahabharata. @KateRusse Do these comments answer your question? |
Yes, thank you very much! |
In the original printed book?
Must be Indian English ))
Hurray, the Mahabharata links are working! @drdhaval2785 what about the highlighter script that show us the line we actually search for?
Yes, hope we are heading there.
I would propose we get rid of the ? with an Apache rewrite?
Sure, let @KateRusse take an eye on it. Do you understand what is to be done? |
This could be done on the Cologne server, but the current hosting on Github does not support Apache rewrites. |
Great! I'll explain what to do in next issue (#49). |
Yes, and it was Hermann Jacobi who has first commented on the point way back in 1903; explaining the total verse number difference in the 3rd parva wrt other editions, counting to over 5000. The same (count difference) has also been mentioned by the BORI editor in the critical edition.
could be, as I started looking at "foreign" books only recently. And this is not listed anywhere 'publicly'.
That script works only on the digital texts, not on images.
There are only a few in pwk, as @funderburkjim correctly noticed. My point was to link them in the same spree.
Nothing to differ; the pwk biblio entry (vol. 1) itself clearly mentions it. And once the Bomb. ed. got published, attention was shifted to it, as it contained a short (?) commentary as well by Nilakantha. It won't be out of context to note that MW has heavily picked up all his citations from pwg and hence it has majority of Calc. ed. MBh. |
@Andhrabharati how do we recognize these? Would you give an example where PWK references the Calcutta edition? |
Even you yourself had the clue, @funderburkjim ! There are 346 places without a dot ending [pl. look at the pw_AB_08.txt file made by you from my file, in November.] |
cleanup of pwg MBH instancesThe work mentioned in a previous comment . |
The cleanup work done in mwg_ls2/mbh directory. Before the work, there were found 29000+ MBH verses with active links and 8700+ malformed MBH references. After the changes, there are now found 55000+ verses with active links, and 27 known malformed links (these are listed in the readme). About 9000 lines of pwg.txt were changed (less than 1% of the current lines). The table of 'NORMAL' link types in the readme file shows what are considered as 'normal' ls references to MBH. Next related improvements to do:
|
great; so this largest cited MBh. in PWG can now be taken as fully linked. and let me see what those 27 malformed ones are, mentioned to be in the readme. |
Here is the file to check and act on the 27 cases- And probably some of these could be linked to the resp. pages of the particular volumes, even if they are not pointing to any text verses. If decided to do so and want my help, they (page numbers) could be provided in no time. |
Yes, they should be linked as well.
I ask, not sure if that's enough. |
Need Jim's option, not yours @gasyoun ! |
PWK Calc. ed. links resolvedAs noted above, the links to Calcutta edition of Mahabharata in PWK are identify as, for example There are roughly 500 such references. By contrast there are 2500+ references to Bombay edition Thus nothing more to do in that regard. |
Only 1 of 27 is identified as 'linkable'. An attempted 'obvious' change (e.g. Current opinion: Not worth the trouble to modify the display program to handle this isolated case. |
Remains to deal with Calcutta edition Hariv. links in PWG, discussed in #49 |
Sorry for coming back to a closed issue and posting. Pl. see my observation as posted at #49 (comment) Just spent few minutes and found ~1500 places where the So I would venture saying that you need to look at these and do some jugglery, instead of leaving as isolated case(s). And here is the list I got, with a quick regex search- |
@Andhrabharati Yes, I've noticed similar MBH misses while working with HARIV. Will focus on missing MBH in a separate issue. |
The aim here is to prepare links to pdf pages for the MBH literary source references in pwg dictionary.
We hope to make use of material developed by @Andhrabharati as described here.
The material includes
From these, for a given reference in pwg, we should be able to provide a link to a pdf of the MBH page.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: