-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: type BatchStatus for all possible states #907
Open
tucnak
wants to merge
2
commits into
sashabaranov:master
Choose a base branch
from
busthorne:batch-status
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tucnak, Could you please re-format this PR? Such huge diffs are very hard to review — I need to write a script to verify that no fields are getting removed.
With a single field's type changed, the diff shouldn't be much larger than an example below:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I'm sorry I had accidentally cherry-picked a different commit into this branch.
I can rebase the last commit away, which is what brings most changes, but what do you think in general, is it perhaps worth merging either way? The
Errors
field is currently inline, & it was a serious issue for me when implementing a batching proxy (as I need to manually aggregate the errors.)I also felt the optional timestamps are better served with omitempty (int64 zero is non-ambiguous) and it's really tedious to handle int64 pointers in general (as opposed to timestamps.) FWIW, I also have this type which is based on
time.Time
implementingjson.Marshaler
andjson.Unmarshaler
on integers. Don't know how willing you are to introduce breaking changes for future major versions, but I think that one is marginally worth it: handlingtime.Time
conversions is quite tedious, and having a type is beneficial to that end, as both functionaltime.Time
and JSON-transparent (you get int64 in and out.)