Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new inspection: abstract trait #887

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

fntz
Copy link
Contributor

@fntz fntz commented Oct 15, 2024

Hello,
I implemented new inspection: check if trait is abstract (first from this list: #302)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.45%. Comparing base (fa90063) to head (ddea55f).
Report is 47 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #887      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.08%   82.45%   -5.64%     
==========================================
  Files         142       19     -123     
  Lines        1578      302    -1276     
  Branches      278       32     -246     
==========================================
- Hits         1390      249    -1141     
+ Misses        188       53     -135     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@saeltz saeltz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution!
Would you please also fix the ReadmeTest?

@saeltz
Copy link
Collaborator

saeltz commented Oct 16, 2024

Would you please also fix the ReadmeTest?

@fntz
Copy link
Contributor Author

fntz commented Oct 16, 2024

Would you please also fix the ReadmeTest?

Done

Copy link
Collaborator

@saeltz saeltz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you interested to add this inspection for Scala 3 as well?

@fntz
Copy link
Contributor Author

fntz commented Oct 16, 2024

Are you interested to add this inspection for Scala 3 as well?

I keep it in mind, but no in the current request, because I have a little experience work with scala 3, maybe in the next PR

@saeltz saeltz merged commit 16b1c9d into scapegoat-scala:master Oct 16, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
@saeltz
Copy link
Collaborator

saeltz commented Oct 16, 2024

@mccartney, would you issue a new release?

@mccartney
Copy link
Collaborator

Triggered the release of 3.1.0. Thanks for the contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants