Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: improve yield prediction index descriptions #420

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 5, 2023

Conversation

alexander-held
Copy link
Member

Following #409, a close look through model_utils revealed that the description of the model prediction indices needed a few improvements, which is done here.

* improve description of the indices of yield predictions and uncertainties

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (7b9b6af) 100.00% compared to head (d745b5c) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #420   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           22        22           
  Lines         2072      2072           
  Branches       337       338    +1     
=========================================
  Hits          2072      2072           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/cabinetry/model_utils.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/cabinetry/tabulate.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@alexander-held alexander-held force-pushed the docs/prediction-indices branch from 9facd61 to d745b5c Compare July 5, 2023 21:37
@alexander-held alexander-held merged commit 5ece244 into master Jul 5, 2023
@alexander-held alexander-held deleted the docs/prediction-indices branch July 5, 2023 21:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant