generated from lf-energy/tsc-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Signed-off-by: Elinor Montmasson <elinor.montmasson@savoirfairelinux.com>
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
83 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ | ||
| # SEAPATH - TSC Meeting | ||
|
|
||
| - Date: 11th July 2024 | ||
| - Attendees: | ||
| - Eloi Bail (Savoir-faire Linux) | ||
| - Paul Le Guen de Kerneizon (Savoir-faire Linux) | ||
| - Mathieu Dupré (Savoir-faire Linux) | ||
| - Tanguy Raufflet (Savoir-faire Linux) | ||
| - Benjamin Chedotel (Savoir-faire Linux) | ||
| - Erwann Roussy (Savoir-faire Linux) | ||
| - Elinor Montmasson (Savoir-faire Linux) | ||
| - Jan Hille (Welotec) | ||
| - Daniel Knüppe (Welotec) | ||
| - Bastien Desbos (RTE) | ||
| - Florent Carli (RTE) | ||
| - Alexander Lougovski (Red Hat) | ||
| - Yair Podemsky (Redhat) | ||
| - Philippe Cizaire (Schneider) | ||
|
|
||
| # Agenda | ||
|
|
||
| - Project news | ||
| - LF Energy Summit 2024 | ||
| - Seapath cyber-security audit | ||
| - Cockpit cluster plugins for Seapath | ||
|
|
||
| # Discussion | ||
|
|
||
| - LF Energy Summit 2024 | ||
| - Multiple SFL presentations | ||
| - Proposition for a Seapath meeting there | ||
| - SEAPATH cyber-security audit | ||
| - Still going on but almost finished, 90% done | ||
| - Good feedback on audit | ||
| - Some elements to improve | ||
| - Seapath project use generally good practices | ||
| - Cockpit cluster plugins | ||
| - Presentation by Tanguy (SFL) of his work | ||
| - Plugins are open-sourced on Github with CI | ||
| - **Questions** | ||
| - *"Are changes done through the plugin UI reflected in Ansible playbooks/inventories ?"* | ||
| - Not possible, but the reverse is true | ||
| - Purpose is not to mix too much Ansible or cockpit plugin, but rather have a tool for manual maintenance through UI | ||
| - *"Did you looked at Ansible Tower as UI ?"* | ||
| - Thinking was done, but not chosen for this work | ||
| - Ansible tower is out of scope for now | ||
| - Managing network on Seapath with Netplan | ||
| - Goals: simplify network configuration | ||
| - Seapath already allows to partially configure the network with systemd networkd via Ansible | ||
| - Support for networkd and netplan should coexist in Seapath | ||
| - Netplan is not compatible with some specific configuration cases | ||
| - Keep backward compatibility, needed by RTE | ||
| - **Questions** | ||
| - *"How is Netplan integrated with Ansible ?"* | ||
| - Possibility to write Netplan template files and use them with Ansible playbooks | ||
| - *"Can Netplan configure OVS stuff ?"* | ||
| - Partially, to the extend of what is supported by Netplan | ||
| - E.g.: not possible to define VXLan parameters for OVS bridges | ||
| - ==> Contact Netplan community, possible contribution ? | ||
| - **General questions and remarks** | ||
| - *"Debian Seapath, should packages be pinned by version for reproducible build ?"* | ||
| - Packages could be pinned for each installation | ||
| - Some people would like to not have some packages updated automatically to keep same configuration of distribution over time | ||
| - Management of update by hand | ||
| - Florent (RTE) says Debian approach should be updating regularly with Debian updates without pinning packages | ||
| - Florent (RTE) think that package version management is out of the scope of Seapath and should be dealt by each client | ||
| - E.g.: local mirors of packages, ... | ||
| - *"Debian Seapath, should we update from/to LTS kernels ?"* | ||
| - Debian kernels =/= Linux mainline LTS kernel | ||
| - *"What are the priorities for the organisation of Seapath repos ?"* | ||
| - Question of the two branches for Yocto and Debian ==> "terrible idea" for Daniel (Welotec) | ||
| - Branch merge POC should be done in a few weeks | ||
| - Need to work with other Seapath members for this | ||
| - Alexander (Red Hat) would like more discussion on the matter first | ||
| - ==> Need to organise a meeting in the upcoming weeks for this with RTE, RedHat, SFL, ... | ||
| ## Vote | ||
|
|
||
| N/A | ||
|
|
||
| # Next TSC | ||
| - Initially for August, but lots of people in holidays | ||
| - ==> Next TSC will be postponed to September | ||
| - Meeting for the branche merge in the upcoming weeks |