-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decomposition of some Completely Regular Semigroups into Strong Semilattices of Semigroups #731
Open
tomcontileslie
wants to merge
6
commits into
semigroups:main
Choose a base branch
from
tomcontileslie:sss-decomp
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cff1a6a
Add IsomorphismSemigroup from Clifford smgp to SSS
tomcontileslie 79d230f
Add IsOrthoGroup property
tomcontileslie f8a4366
SSS Decomp bugfix
tomcontileslie 2c1d259
SSS Decomp: add test
tomcontileslie 21e5eae
SSS Decomp: add 2 more tests
tomcontileslie 825aee3
SSS Decomp: address Wilf's comments
tomcontileslie File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can directly get this via
(although I don't think that necessarily (or at all?) contains
x
inN[x]
for eachx
- if those are actually necessary, you will still want to add them or modify your code below to acts as if they are there).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @wilfwilson, unfortunately I get a "no method found" error when running ReverseNaturalPartialOrder on some inputs - for example:
Although you are correct that we don't need
x
inN[x]
since the homomorphisms in this case are the identity, and the strong semilattice constructor is clever enough to fill that in upon creation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, I'm realising that taking the reflexive transitive reduction of
D
is redundant, since the SSS constructor effectively reverts this, so I'll remove that part