test mvn #111
test mvn #111
Conversation
## Walkthrough
The recent updates enhance the Maven Central publishing workflow by improving clarity, security, and functionality. Changes include a more concise workflow name, the addition of a pull request trigger for immediate feedback, and a refined setup process with specified Java versions. Additionally, the cache management system has been restructured to allow multiple cache containers, promoting flexibility and scalability within the Klein framework.
## Changes
| Files | Change Summary |
|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| `.github/workflows/maven-publish.yml` | Updated workflow name to "Maven Publish," added pull request trigger for the main branch, specified JDK version in setup, and streamlined the Maven build command. |
| `klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/*.java` | Introduced `cacheName` property in `CacheMessage`, refactored `CacheSM` to use a map for multiple cache containers, and updated related methods to improve cache management. |
| `klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/*.java` | Modified `KleinLockImpl` constructor for clarity and refactored state management in `LockSM`, introducing `LockInstance` for better encapsulation. |
| `klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/*.java` | Shifted from factory-based to direct instantiation of `KleinCacheImpl`, simplifying cache creation in multiple example classes. |
| `klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/*.java` | Similar shift from factory to direct instantiation of `KleinLockImpl` across multiple classes, altering the locking mechanism's instantiation process. |
| `klein-core/src/test/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/CacheSMTest.java` | Updated tests to support new map-based cache container management and modified operations to reflect cache names. |
## Sequence Diagram(s)
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant GitHub
participant MavenCentral
Developer->>GitHub: Create Pull Request
GitHub->>MavenCentral: Trigger "Maven Publish" Workflow
MavenCentral->>MavenCentral: Set up JDK 1.8
MavenCentral->>MavenCentral: Build with Maven (skip tests, GPG sign)
MavenCentral-->>GitHub: Publish Artifact
This has been replaced with direct instantiation of KleinCache klein1 = new KleinCacheImpl("klein1");
KleinCache klein2 = new KleinCacheImpl("klein2");This change modifies the control flow by eliminating the factory method, which may have implications for configuration or management of cache instances. The new approach indicates a shift towards a more straightforward method of cache creation, potentially simplifying the code but risking the loss of any additional logic or configuration that the factory method previously provided. The functionality of cache usage remains unchanged, as operations on Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main1.java: ## AI-generated summary of changes The diff introduces a significant change in how the Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main2.java: ## AI-generated summary of changes The diff introduces significant changes to the way the Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main3.java: ## AI-generated summary of changes The changes in the provided diff primarily involve the instantiation of the Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main1.java: ## AI-generated summary of changes The changes in the provided diff primarily involve the instantiation of the Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main2.java: ## AI-generated summary of changes The changes in the provided diff primarily involve the instantiation of the Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main3.java: ## AI-generated summary of changes The diff introduces a significant change in how a Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/maven-publish.yml (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/maven-publish.yml (4)
1-1: Workflow name change approved.The change to a more concise workflow name "Maven Publish" is clear and appropriate.
6-7: Addition of pull request trigger approved.Including a
pull_requesttrigger for themainbranch enhances the CI/CD process by providing immediate feedback on pull requests.
26-31: Maven build step update approved.The step "Build with Maven" and the updated command streamline the build process by skipping tests and GPG signing, which is suitable for deployment.
16-24: Java setup step update approved.The step name "Set up JDK 1.8" clarifies the Java version, and the additional parameters enhance security for Maven publishing.
Ensure that the secrets used (
GPG_SECRET,OSSRH_USER,OSSRH_PASSWORD,GPG_PASSWORD) are correctly configured in the repository settings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main1.java (1)
30-30: Consider the implications of direct instantiation.The change from
KleinFactory.getInstance().createLock("klein")tonew KleinLockImpl("klein")introduces tight coupling to theKleinLockImplclass. This reduces flexibility and testability, as switching to a different implementation would require code changes.If the factory pattern was used to allow for different lock implementations, consider maintaining it or using dependency injection to manage the lock creation.
Also applies to: 58-58
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main1.java (1)
29-29: Consider the implications of direct instantiation.The change from
KleinFactory.getInstance().createCache("klein")tonew KleinCacheImpl("klein")introduces tight coupling to theKleinCacheImplclass. This reduces flexibility and testability, as switching to a different implementation would require code changes.If the factory pattern was used to allow for different cache implementations, consider maintaining it or using dependency injection to manage the cache creation.
Also applies to: 58-58
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (16)
- .github/workflows/maven-publish.yml (2 hunks)
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/CacheSM.java (1 hunks)
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/KleinCacheImpl.java (2 hunks)
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/KleinLockImpl.java (2 hunks)
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java (4 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/alone/Main.java (2 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main1.java (2 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main2.java (2 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main3.java (2 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main1.java (2 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main2.java (2 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main3.java (2 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main1.java (2 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main2.java (2 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main3.java (2 hunks)
- klein-jepsen/klein-jepsen-server/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/jepsen/server/KleinServer.java (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/maven-publish.yml
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main2.java
[warning] 47-47: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main2.java#L47
Added line #L47 was not covered by testsklein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main3.java
[warning] 47-47: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main3.java#L47
Added line #L47 was not covered by testsklein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main2.java
[warning] 57-57: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main2.java#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by testsklein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main3.java
[warning] 57-57: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main3.java#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by testsklein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main2.java
[warning] 57-57: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main2.java#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by testsklein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main3.java
[warning] 57-58: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main3.java#L57-L58
Added lines #L57 - L58 were not covered by testsklein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/alone/Main.java
[warning] 51-52: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/alone/Main.java#L51-L52
Added lines #L51 - L52 were not covered by testsklein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/KleinLockImpl.java
[warning] 40-43: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/KleinLockImpl.java#L40-L43
Added lines #L40 - L43 were not covered by testsklein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main1.java
[warning] 62-62: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main1.java#L62
Added line #L62 was not covered by testsklein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java
[warning] 34-34: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L34
Added line #L34 was not covered by tests
[warning] 46-47: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L46-L47
Added lines #L46 - L47 were not covered by tests
[warning] 53-54: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests
[warning] 64-64: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L64
Added line #L64 was not covered by tests
[warning] 72-75: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L72-L75
Added lines #L72 - L75 were not covered by tests
[warning] 77-77: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L77
Added line #L77 was not covered by tests
[warning] 80-81: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L80-L81
Added lines #L80 - L81 were not covered by tests
[warning] 84-84: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L84
Added line #L84 was not covered by tests
[warning] 88-89: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L88-L89
Added lines #L88 - L89 were not covered by tests
[warning] 92-92: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L92
Added line #L92 was not covered by tests
[warning] 96-97: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L96-L97
Added lines #L96 - L97 were not covered by testsklein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main1.java
[warning] 58-58: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main1.java#L58
Added line #L58 was not covered by testsklein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/KleinCacheImpl.java
[warning] 41-43: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/KleinCacheImpl.java#L41-L43
Added lines #L41 - L43 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (14)
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main2.java (1)
27-27: Verify the impact of bypassing the factory.Directly instantiating
KleinCacheImplbypasses any additional logic inKleinFactory. Ensure that no essential configuration or setup is missed by this change.klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main3.java (2)
27-27: Verify the impact of bypassing the factory.Directly instantiating
KleinCacheImplbypasses any additional logic inKleinFactory. Ensure that no essential configuration or setup is missed by this change.
47-47: Reminder: Add tests for the new instantiation.The line where
KleinCacheImplis directly instantiated is not covered by tests.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 47-47: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main3.java#L47
Added line #L47 was not covered by testsklein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/lock/Main2.java (1)
27-27: Verify the impact of bypassing the factory.Directly instantiating
KleinLockImplbypasses any additional logic inKleinFactory. Ensure that no essential configuration or setup is missed by this change.Verification successful
Direct instantiation of
KleinLockImplis consistent across the codebase.The direct instantiation of
KleinLockImplis used in multiple files, and no factory method or additional setup logic was found. Therefore, bypassing a factory does not seem to impact the configuration or setup ofKleinLockinstances in this codebase.
- Instances of direct instantiation found in:
Main1.javaMain2.javaMain3.javaScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of bypassing the factory method for KleinLock. # Test: Search for the factory method implementation to understand its logic. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class KleinFactory { $$$ public KleinLock createLock($_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the KleinFactory class definition to verify its existence. ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class KleinFactory { $$$ }' # Search for any createLock method implementations in the codebase. ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'public $_ createLock($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any instantiation of KleinLockImpl in the codebase. rg 'new KleinLockImpl' -A 5 # Search for any method that returns KleinLock or involves its creation. ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'public KleinLock $_($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 1821
klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/alone/Main.java (2)
28-28: New Import Added: Verify Necessity and Impact.The import statement for
KleinCacheImplsuggests a shift from using a factory method to direct instantiation. Ensure that this change is intentional and does not bypass any important configuration or initialization logic previously handled by the factory.Verification successful
Direct Instantiation of KleinCacheImpl is Intentional
The consistent pattern of directly instantiating
KleinCacheImplacross multiple files suggests that this approach is intentional. There is no evidence of a factory method being bypassed. The change appears to be in line with the current design.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of KleinCacheImpl across the codebase to ensure the change is intentional. # Test: Search for KleinCacheImpl usage. Expect: Consistent usage patterns. rg --type java 'KleinCacheImpl'Length of output: 2449
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any factory methods or comments related to KleinCacheImpl rg --type java 'KleinCacheFactory' rg --type java 'factory'Length of output: 874
51-52: Direct Instantiation of KleinCacheImpl: Review Implications.The direct instantiation of
KleinCacheImplmay simplify the code but could reduce flexibility and bypass any additional setup provided by the factory method. Assess whether this change aligns with the overall design and architecture goals.Verification successful
Direct Instantiation of KleinCacheImpl: Verification Complete.
The constructor of
KleinCacheImplhandles necessary setup tasks like group name construction and registration withSMRegistry. Direct instantiation does not bypass any critical setup, as these tasks are managed within the constructor itself. Therefore, the change aligns with the current design.
KleinCacheImplconstructor handles setup:klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/KleinCacheImpl.javaScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that direct instantiation does not bypass critical setup. # Test: Search for factory method usage to understand previous setup logic. rg --type java 'KleinFactory.getInstance().createCache'Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of KleinCacheImpl to inspect its constructor. ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class KleinCacheImpl { $$$ }'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the file containing the KleinCacheImpl class definition. rg --type java 'class KleinCacheImpl' -A 10Length of output: 1235
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 51-52: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/alone/Main.java#L51-L52
Added lines #L51 - L52 were not covered by testsklein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/KleinLockImpl.java (3)
33-33: Key Variable Made Final: Confirm Immutability Benefits.The
keyvariable is now final, which improves immutability. Confirm that this change aligns with the intended design and does not conflict with any existing functionality.
23-23: New Import Added: SMRegistry.The addition of
SMRegistryindicates a new registration process for lock instances. Ensure that this integration is correctly implemented and does not introduce any unintended side effects.Verification successful
Integration of SMRegistry is Correct
The integration of
SMRegistryinKleinLockImpl.javais consistent with its usage pattern across the codebase. TheLockSMclass is appropriately registered using a structured key, ensuring no unintended side effects. No issues found with the integration.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of SMRegistry in the codebase. # Test: Search for SMRegistry usage to understand its integration. rg --type java 'SMRegistry'Length of output: 1522
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of LockSM and the context of `this.key` in KleinLockImpl.java. # Search for the definition and usage of LockSM. rg --type java 'class LockSM' # Inspect the context of `this.key` in KleinLockImpl.java. rg --type java 'this.key' -A 5 klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/KleinLockImpl.javaLength of output: 534
40-43: Constructor Changes: Ensure Proper Registration and Initialization.The constructor now registers the lock name with
SMRegistryand initializesGroupWrapper. Verify that these changes are correctly implemented and do not disrupt existing functionality.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 40-43: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/KleinLockImpl.java#L40-L43
Added lines #L40 - L43 were not covered by testsklein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main1.java (2)
26-27: New Import Added: Verify Necessity and Impact.The import statement for
KleinCacheImplsuggests a shift from using a factory method to direct instantiation. Ensure that this change is intentional and does not bypass any important configuration or initialization logic previously handled by the factory.Verification successful
Direct Instantiation of
KleinCacheImplis IntentionalThe direct instantiation of
KleinCacheImplappears to be an intentional design choice. The constructor handles necessary initialization, and there is no documentation suggesting the use of a factory method. Therefore, the import and usage are appropriate.
KleinCacheImplconstructor performs essential initialization steps.- No indication of a factory method being required.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of KleinCacheImpl across the codebase to ensure the change is intentional. # Test: Search for KleinCacheImpl usage. Expect: Consistent usage patterns. rg --type java 'KleinCacheImpl'Length of output: 2449
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for comments or documentation in KleinCacheImpl that might indicate preferred usage patterns. # Test: Look for comments in KleinCacheImpl.java. Expect: Guidance on usage. rg --type java 'KleinCacheImpl' -A 5Length of output: 10857
62-62: Direct Instantiation of KleinCacheImpl: Review Implications.The direct instantiation of
KleinCacheImplmay simplify the code but could reduce flexibility and bypass any additional setup provided by the factory method. Assess whether this change aligns with the overall design and architecture goals.Verification successful
Direct Instantiation of KleinCacheImpl Seems Appropriate
The codebase does not appear to use a factory method for creating
KleinCacheinstances, suggesting that direct instantiation does not bypass any critical setup. This change aligns with the current design approach.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that direct instantiation does not bypass critical setup. # Test: Search for factory method usage to understand previous setup logic. rg --type java 'KleinFactory.getInstance().createCache'Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any factory methods related to KleinCache or KleinCacheImpl rg --type java 'KleinFactory' -A 5Length of output: 34
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 62-62: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main1.java#L62
Added line #L62 was not covered by testsklein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java (1)
32-32: Update constant name usage across the codebase.The constant
GROUPhas been renamed toGROUP_PREFIX. Ensure that all references to this constant in the codebase are updated to reflect this change.Verification successful
Constant name update verified successfully.
The constant
GROUP_PREFIXhas been correctly updated in all relevant parts of the codebase. No further action is required.
LockSM.java: Definition ofGROUP_PREFIX.KleinLockImpl.java: Usage ofGROUP_PREFIX.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the renamed constant `GROUP_PREFIX`. # Test: Search for the usage of `GROUP_PREFIX`. Expect: All references are updated. rg --type java 'GROUP_PREFIX'Length of output: 531
klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/CacheSM.java (1)
33-33: Verify constant name change across the codebase.The constant
GROUPhas been renamed toGROUP_PREFIX. Ensure that all references to this constant in the codebase are updated to reflect this change.Verification successful
Constant Renaming Verified Successfully
The constant
GROUPin theCacheSMclass has been successfully renamed toGROUP_PREFIX, and all references have been updated across the codebase. The remaining occurrences ofGROUPare unrelated to theCacheSMclass and pertain to different contexts. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the renamed constant `GROUP_PREFIX`. # Test: Search for the usage of `GROUP_PREFIX`. Expect: All references are updated. rg --type java 'GROUP_PREFIX'Length of output: 531
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to the old constant name `GROUP`. rg --type java 'GROUP\b'Length of output: 2210
klein-jepsen/klein-jepsen-server/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/jepsen/server/KleinServer.java (1)
63-63: Assess the impact of direct instantiation of KleinCache.The direct instantiation of
KleinCacheImplreplaces the factory method. Verify that this change does not negatively impact the configuration or lifecycle management of the cache.
| @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ | |||
| }); | |||
| latch.await(); | |||
|
|
|||
| KleinCache klein = KleinFactory.getInstance().createCache("klein"); | |||
| KleinCache klein = new KleinCacheImpl("klein"); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add test coverage for the new cache instantiation.
The line where KleinCacheImpl is instantiated is not covered by tests. Consider adding unit tests to ensure that the cache behaves as expected and to verify the correctness of the new instantiation logic.
Would you like me to help write the unit tests or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 58-58: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/cache/Main1.java#L58
Added line #L58 was not covered by tests
| public KleinCacheImpl(final String cacheName) { | ||
| String group = CacheSM.GROUP_PREFIX + "_" + cacheName; | ||
| SMRegistry.register(group, new CacheSM(CacheProp.loadIfPresent())); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure test coverage for the new constructor logic.
The constructor now uses cacheName to create a group identifier and registers it with SMRegistry. This logic is not covered by tests. Consider adding unit tests to verify that the group is correctly formed and registered, ensuring the caching mechanism functions as intended.
Would you like me to help write the unit tests or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 41-43: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/KleinCacheImpl.java#L41-L43
Added lines #L41 - L43 were not covered by tests
| @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ | |||
| KleinProp prop2 = KleinProp.loadIfPresent(); | |||
|
|
|||
| Klein instance2 = Klein.startup(); | |||
| KleinCache klein = KleinFactory.getInstance().createCache("klein"); | |||
| KleinCache klein = new KleinCacheImpl("klein"); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reminder: Add tests for the new instantiation.
The line where KleinCacheImpl is directly instantiated is not covered by tests.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 47-47: klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/nwr/Main2.java#L47
Added line #L47 was not covered by tests
| import com.ofcoder.klein.KleinProp; | ||
| import com.ofcoder.klein.core.lock.KleinLock; | ||
| import com.ofcoder.klein.core.lock.KleinLockImpl; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider the implications of direct instantiation.
The change from using a factory method to directly instantiating KleinLockImpl reduces flexibility by tying the code to a specific implementation. If future changes require different implementations, this could necessitate further code modifications.
Additionally, the static analysis hint indicates that this line is not covered by tests. Consider adding tests to ensure the functionality is verified.
Would you like me to help draft a test plan or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Also applies to: 57-57
| import com.ofcoder.klein.KleinProp; | ||
| import com.ofcoder.klein.core.cache.KleinCache; | ||
| import com.ofcoder.klein.core.cache.KleinCacheImpl; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider the implications of direct instantiation.
Switching from a factory method to directly instantiating KleinCacheImpl reduces the flexibility of the code by binding it to a specific implementation. This might limit future extensibility if different cache implementations are needed.
Additionally, the static analysis hint indicates that this line is not covered by tests. Consider adding tests to ensure the functionality is verified.
Would you like me to help draft a test plan or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Also applies to: 57-57
| if (instance.lockState == LockInstance.UNLOCK_STATE || (instance.expire != LockMessage.TTL_PERPETUITY && instance.expire < TrueTime.currentTimeMillis())) { | ||
| instance.lockState = LockInstance.LOCKED_STATE; | ||
| instance.expire = message.getExpire(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add test cases for lock state transitions.
The logic for transitioning the lock state from unlocked to locked should be tested, especially the conditions involving expiration.
Would you like assistance in creating test cases for these transitions?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 46-47: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L46-L47
Added lines #L46 - L47 were not covered by tests
| instance.lockState = LockInstance.UNLOCK_STATE; | ||
| instance.expire = 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add test cases for unlocking logic.
Ensure that the unlocking logic is tested, particularly the reset of the expiration.
Would you like assistance in creating test cases for the unlocking logic?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 53-54: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests
| @@ -63,14 +61,39 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| @Override | |||
| public Object makeImage() { | |||
| return lockState; | |||
| return instance; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add test coverage for makeImage method.
The makeImage method should be tested to confirm it returns the correct state of the LockInstance.
Would you like assistance in creating a test for the makeImage method?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 64-64: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L64
Added line #L64 was not covered by tests
| if (!(snap instanceof LockInstance)) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| lockState = (Byte) snap; | ||
| LockInstance snapInstance = (LockInstance) snap; | ||
| instance.lockState = snapInstance.lockState; | ||
| instance.expire = snapInstance.expire; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add test coverage for loadImage method.
The loadImage method should be tested to ensure it correctly restores the state from a LockInstance.
Would you like assistance in creating a test for the loadImage method?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 72-75: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L72-L75
Added lines #L72 - L75 were not covered by tests
| static class LockInstance implements Serializable { | ||
| private static final byte UNLOCK_STATE = 0x00; | ||
| private static final byte LOCKED_STATE = 0x01; | ||
| private Byte lockState = UNLOCK_STATE; | ||
| private long expire = 0; | ||
|
|
||
| public Byte getLockState() { | ||
| return lockState; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public void setLockState(final Byte lockState) { | ||
| this.lockState = lockState; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public long getExpire() { | ||
| return expire; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public void setExpire(final long expire) { | ||
| this.expire = expire; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure serialization compatibility for LockInstance.
Since LockInstance implements Serializable, ensure that serialization and deserialization processes are tested.
Would you like assistance in creating tests for serialization of LockInstance?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 77-77: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L77
Added line #L77 was not covered by tests
[warning] 80-81: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L80-L81
Added lines #L80 - L81 were not covered by tests
[warning] 84-84: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L84
Added line #L84 was not covered by tests
[warning] 88-89: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L88-L89
Added lines #L88 - L89 were not covered by tests
[warning] 92-92: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L92
Added line #L92 was not covered by tests
[warning] 96-97: klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java#L96-L97
Added lines #L96 - L97 were not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/maven-publish.yml (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/maven-publish.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/CacheMessage.java (3 hunks)
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/CacheSM.java (4 hunks)
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/KleinCacheImpl.java (10 hunks)
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/KleinLockImpl.java (2 hunks)
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java (4 hunks)
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/alone/Main.java (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/KleinCacheImpl.java
- klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/LockSM.java
- klein-example/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/example/alone/Main.java
Additional comments not posted (12)
klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/CacheMessage.java (4)
37-37: New fieldcacheNameadded.The addition of the
cacheNamefield enhances the functionality of theCacheMessageclass by allowing it to store the name of the cache associated with the message.
50-52: Getter method forcacheNameadded.The
getCacheName()method correctly retrieves the value of thecacheNamefield.
54-56: Setter method forcacheNameadded.The
setCacheName(final String cacheName)method correctly assigns a value to thecacheNamefield.
86-86:toString()method updated to includecacheName.The
toString()method now includes thecacheNamefield, which improves the string representation of theCacheMessageinstances.klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/lock/KleinLockImpl.java (2)
33-33:keyfield changed tofinal.The
keyfield is nowfinal, ensuring that it remains immutable after initialization. This change enhances the integrity of the lock.
40-43: Constructor updated to acceptkeyand register withSMRegistry.The constructor now takes a
keyparameter and registers the lock withSMRegistry, improving the management and tracking of lock instances.klein-core/src/main/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/CacheSM.java (6)
37-37:containersmap introduced for managing multiple cache containers.The
containersmap allows theCacheSMclass to manage multiple cache containers, enhancing its flexibility and functionality.
51-58:getCacheContainermethod introduced.The
getCacheContainermethod retrieves or creates a cache container based on the cache name, supporting the management of multiple caches.
68-68:applymethod updated to usegetCacheContainer.The
applymethod now retrieves the appropriate container using the cache name from theCacheMessage, aligning with the new multi-cache strategy.
95-97:makeImagemethod updated to aggregate images from all containers.The
makeImagemethod now collects images from all cache containers, supporting the new multi-cache architecture.
100-108:loadImagemethod updated to handle multiple cache containers.The
loadImagemethod now processes a map of snapshots, loading images for each cache container, consistent with the multi-cache design.
113-113:closemethod updated to close all cache containers.The
closemethod now iterates over and closes all cache containers, ensuring proper resource management in the new multi-cache setup.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- klein-core/src/test/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/CacheSMTest.java (7 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
klein-core/src/test/java/com/ofcoder/klein/core/cache/CacheSMTest.java (8)
39-44: LGTM! The setup method correctly initializes the containers.The changes to the setup method correctly reflect the transition to using a map for cache containers.
50-51: LGTM! The test correctly adapts to the new caching strategy.The test for the
PUToperation correctly uses the cache name "test" and verifies the expected behavior.
62-63: LGTM! The test correctly adapts to the new caching strategy.The test for the
GEToperation correctly uses the cache name "test" and verifies the expected behavior.
74-75: LGTM! The test correctly adapts to the new caching strategy.The test for the
INVALIDATEoperation correctly uses the cache name "test" and verifies the expected behavior.
85-86: LGTM! The test correctly adapts to the new caching strategy.The test for the
INVALIDATEALLoperation correctly uses the cache name "test" and verifies the expected behavior.
95-96: LGTM! The test correctly adapts to the new caching strategy.The test for the
PUTIFPRESENToperation correctly uses the cache name "test" and verifies the expected behavior.
109-110: LGTM! The test correctly adapts to the new caching strategy.The test for the
EXISToperation correctly uses the cache name "test" and verifies the expected behavior.
Line range hint
118-118:
LGTM! The test correctly verifies behavior for unknown messages.The test ensures that no operations are performed for unknown messages, and it remains valid with the new caching strategy.
Summary by CodeRabbit
KleinCacheandKleinLockto improve clarity and performance.