-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[NONEVM-904] Update address book to support nonevm #15269
Merged
prashantkumar1982
merged 18 commits into
develop
from
update-addressbook-to-support-nonevm
Nov 22, 2024
Merged
Changes from 16 commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
58c3eb6
Update address book to support nonevm
jlaveracll c10af69
Update address book to include nonevm
jlaveracll 4132479
avoid address validation for non evm chains
jlaveracll 1ad01a2
merge'
jlaveracll 9c2398d
Merge branch 'develop' of github.com:smartcontractkit/chainlink into …
jlaveracll b5b95e1
address feedback
jlaveracll 5fc8f07
Merge branch 'develop' of github.com:smartcontractkit/chainlink into …
jlaveracll a77e91e
merge with develop
jlaveracll ad98911
fix merge
jlaveracll 051be36
remove comments
jlaveracll 374ee75
clean up
jlaveracll 409e9ba
Merge branch 'develop' of github.com:smartcontractkit/chainlink into …
jlaveracll 122241f
Update plugin.go
jlaveracll f013d31
bump chain selector to 1.0.31
jlaveracll 0a2ef89
merge
jlaveracll fb24bb7
Merge branch 'develop' into update-addressbook-to-support-nonevm
prashantkumar1982 986a6a4
ran make gomodtidy
jlaveracll 3ba1ff2
Merge branch 'develop' of github.com:smartcontractkit/chainlink into …
jlaveracll File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
--- | ||
"chainlink": minor | ||
--- | ||
|
||
Update deployment address book to support non-evm chains |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could add your aptos specific validation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we don't have any yet, but we'll create a ticket to add it later. We are already tackling hardening tasks like this one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was toying with an idea of building in aptos and other chain or family validations into the chainlink-selectors repo, so we'd have a set of reusable validations keyed off of chain ID in a way that hides all the conditionality from calling code. Valid addresses was definitely in the right zone. Doing it here is fine, but we should think about making this more generally usable.