Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
integration-tests/smoke: add batching test #15292
integration-tests/smoke: add batching test #15292
Changes from 1 commit
dda5b8a
f37b3db
0b9c6aa
f579844
dc7879b
388f17c
7e81e4e
8a5dc84
8aead48
f05bd44
c0fda7f
a8bf583
9bfaa78
02fef89
6e974fc
83e41a9
c88a2ff
d3c71c1
3f7cb4b
7401b4a
f78c4c5
497b5a9
90f92e9
e50f9a4
a0b864b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even though the test is oriented around commit batching, I think it would be worth waiting for messages execution. We don't care about batch sizes for exec, but we want to make sure everything is successfully executed (e.g. this large commit batch is properly processed by the exec)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I thought about that as well. Exec doesn't have to batch like commit due to gas limits though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That doesn't work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually that does work, just weirder :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tested it before writing it :D. I know it works but why is it weirder? I think it's much clearer that way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not used anywhere, is it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't used anywhere but if we add test cases further down (which was the plan, wanted to add something where we manual exec a message that is part of a root with multiple msgs)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it's not gonna be used in this PR then better remove them to make the next PR easier to understand when seeing it added.