Fix export module name

[CrazyHZM]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved the criteria for identifying JDK module packages, enhancing package export functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@sofastack-cla[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c34c1e and 1713114.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• sofa-boot-project/sofa-boot/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/boot/util/ModuleUtil.java (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the exportAllJDKModulePackageToAll method in the ModuleUtil class. The key change involves the criteria for identifying JDK module packages, which now relies on the module's name instead of the package name. This adjustment alters the method's logic for selecting packages for export while maintaining the overall structure, including error handling and export operations.

Changes

File	Change Summary
sofa-boot-project/sofa-boot/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/boot/util/ModuleUtil.java	Modified package export logic in exportAllJDKModulePackageToAll method, switching from package name to module name check

Poem

🐰 Modules dance, a new rhythm they find,
Names shifting, boundaries redesigned,
From package to module, the logic takes flight,
A rabbit's code hops with algorithmic might!
Export paths change, yet purpose stays clear 🔍

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.90%. Comparing base (0c34c1e) to head (1713114).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ain/java/com/alipay/sofa/boot/util/ModuleUtil.java	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1357      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     82.93%   82.90%   -0.04%     
+ Complexity     2976     2973       -3     
============================================
  Files           340      340              
  Lines          9837     9837              
  Branches       1179     1179              
============================================
- Hits           8158     8155       -3     
  Misses         1163     1163              
- Partials        516      519       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.