Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[action] [PR:17030] [Mellanox] Remove EEPROM write limitation if it is software control #17694

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2024

Conversation

mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Why I did it

When module is under software control (CMIS host management enabled), EEPROM should be controlled by software and there should be no limitation for any write operation.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Remove EEPROM write limitation if a module is under software control

How to verify it

Manual test
UT

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305
  • 202311

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

…onic-net#17030)

- Why I did it
When module is under software control (CMIS host management enabled), EEPROM should be controlled by software and there should be no limitation for any write operation.

- How I did it
Remove EEPROM write limitation if a module is under software control

- How to verify it
Manual test
UT
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #17030

@Junchao-Mellanox
Copy link
Collaborator

/azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 4060f5c into sonic-net:202311 Jan 7, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants