fix(i): SetReplicator and DeleteReplicator params

[nasdf]

Relevant issue(s)

Resolves #3159

Description

This PR fixes an issue where replicator params that are not modifiable were exposed to the client API.

Tasks

• I made sure the code is well commented, particularly hard-to-understand areas.
• I made sure the repository-held documentation is changed accordingly.
• I made sure the pull request title adheres to the conventional commit style (the subset used in the project can be found in tools/configs/chglog/config.yml).
• I made sure to discuss its limitations such as threats to validity, vulnerability to mistake and misuse, robustness to invalidation of assumptions, resource requirements, ...

How has this been tested?

Existing integration tests.

Specify the platform(s) on which this was tested:

• (modify the list accordingly)
• MacOS

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.04%. Comparing base (b268c0b) to head (fa9cbb8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3175      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    77.98%   78.04%   +0.05%     
===========================================
  Files          354      354              
  Lines        34669    34672       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits         27036    27057      +21     
+ Misses        6003     5991      -12     
+ Partials      1630     1624       -6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
all-tests	78.04% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
cli/p2p_replicator_delete.go	88.89% <100.00%> (ø)
cli/p2p_replicator_set.go	88.89% <100.00%> (ø)
http/client_p2p.go	52.27% <100.00%> (ø)
http/handler_p2p.go	73.58% <100.00%> (+0.38%)	⬆️
http/openapi.go	97.52% <ø> (ø)
internal/db/p2p_replicator.go	60.95% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b268c0b...fa9cbb8. Read the comment docs.

[fredcarle]

thought: Might as well change the Schema to Collection to match ReplicatorParams

[nasdf]

The Schemas field contains schema roots though not collections.

[fredcarle]

True. Disregard my thought then. 👍

[fredcarle]

LGTM. Just one thougth.

[shahzadlone]

LGTM