Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport 6248: Fix response data slice too small #6249

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024
Merged

Backport 6248: Fix response data slice too small #6249

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

fasmat
Copy link
Member

@fasmat fasmat commented Aug 13, 2024

Motivation

Backport of #6248

Description

Backports the fix in #6248.

Test Plan

  • n/a

TODO

  • Explain motivation or link existing issue(s)
  • Test changes and document test plan
  • Update documentation as needed
  • Update changelog as needed

## Motivation

The response msg object needs to be increased in size to allow 8.0 Mio ATXs to be processed by the node
@fasmat fasmat self-assigned this Aug 13, 2024
@fasmat fasmat enabled auto-merge (squash) August 13, 2024 07:24
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.7%. Comparing base (f07c531) to head (044f680).
Report is 3 commits behind head on v1.6.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            v1.6   #6249     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   81.7%   81.7%   -0.1%     
=======================================
  Files        301     301             
  Lines      32306   32290     -16     
=======================================
- Hits       26416   26401     -15     
- Misses      4170    4171      +1     
+ Partials    1720    1718      -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fasmat fasmat merged commit cc52738 into v1.6 Aug 13, 2024
23 checks passed
@fasmat fasmat deleted the backport-6248 branch August 13, 2024 08:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants