Removing filter warning for mpl-scatter-density

[bmorris3]

Description

The filtered warning for mpl-scatter-density may be unnecessary since the release of v0.8. Trying that out in this PR.

It turns out that there was an in situ pkg_resources warning stemming from linelists.py, too.

Related PRs:

• Bump pin for mpl-scatter-density glue-viz/glue#2521
• Import version from setuptools_scm artifact astrofrog/mpl-scatter-density#47
• Ignore mpl_scatter_density warning temporarily lcviz#156
• Fix CI/RTD failures #3317

Change log entry

• Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
  list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
  should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

• Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
• Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
• Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
• Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone. Bugfix milestone also needs an accompanying backport label.
• After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

[rosteen]

Looks like you realized linelists.py was causing problems at the same time I did. This looks good, what's stopping you from moving it out of draft? I would like to see CI passing on some other PRs.

Edit: Oh, right, this is removing the ignore not adding it. Could you split the linelists.py fix out to a separate PR that we can merge now?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.80%. Comparing base (81e940d) to head (ca6cc6e).
Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3327   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.80%   88.80%           
=======================================
  Files         125      125           
  Lines       19119    19119           
=======================================
+ Hits        16978    16979    +1     
+ Misses       2141     2140    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bmorris3]

@rosteen both fixes are ready to go in this PR pending reviews.

[rosteen]

Excellent, I didn't realize that Tom just did that release. Approved, thanks!

[rosteen]

IMHO we could mark this trivial and get it in 🤷

[rosteen]

Forgot to add the backport label to this, I cherry-picked the commit into #3348.