Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gc codes/sparrow refactoring #734

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 9, 2024

Conversation

gc-codes
Copy link
Member

@gc-codes gc-codes commented Apr 9, 2024

Description

Please do not leave this blank

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • πŸ• Feature
  • πŸ› Bug Fix
  • πŸ“ Documentation Update
  • 🎨 Style
  • πŸ§‘β€πŸ’» Code Refactor
  • πŸ”₯ Performance Improvements
  • βœ… Test
  • πŸ€– Build

Have you tested locally?

  • πŸ‘ yes
  • πŸ™… no, because I am lazy

Added tests?

  • πŸ‘ yes
  • πŸ™… no, because they aren't needed
  • πŸ™‹ no, because I need help

Added to documentation?

  • πŸ“œ README.md

Any Known issue?

Related Story, task & Documents?

@punitkashyup
Copy link
Member

Please attach the issue link

@punitkashyup
Copy link
Member

Please attach the issue link

@punitkashyup
Copy link
Member

SonarQube Quality Gate Result

  • Result: βœ… OK
  • Triggered by @gc-codes on pull_request
Metric Status Value Error Threshold
New reliability rating βœ… OK 1 > 1
New security rating βœ… OK 1 > 1
New maintainability rating βœ… OK 1 > 1

View on SonarQube

updated: 4/9/2024, 11:48:50 (UTC+0)

@LordNayan LordNayan merged commit ec07d8d into feat/sparrow-refactoring Apr 9, 2024
1 of 3 checks passed
@LordNayan LordNayan deleted the gc-codes/sparrow-refactoring branch April 9, 2024 11:51
@pratikshinde590
Copy link
Contributor

πŸŽ‰ This PR is included in version 1.3.0 πŸŽ‰

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot πŸ“¦πŸš€

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants